All, By the way, can anyone confirm whether or not serweb is being actively developed?
Thanks, Mike Williams On Tuesday 28 November 2006 05:34, samuel wrote: > Hi folks, > I've tried to stay out of this thread but I think it has gone far > beyond technical arguments and I don't think it will help neither SER > or openSER projects. I would just ask to stop this thread before it > get worst or stack to technical discussions (which I'm learning a lot) > and leave personal appreciations aside. > > I still see advantages on each project and depending on the > requirements, one is more suited than the other. I had the hope that > both would merge with the best of them but I see this almost > impossible right now... > > I'll try to summarize differences and I would apreciate *technical* > corrections to it (it's almost impossible to have an update > list....fortunately, i've tried to enumerate diferences in the dev > versions which will soon become stable): > *openSER: > o1)detailled documentation, including howtos > o2)fast reaction in the mailing list from the core developers > o3)incorporate user comments into new features > o4)decentralised developers > o5)improved usrloc (loading on mem, cacheless) > o6)gaining user acceptance->biggest testing comunity > > *SER > s1)improved TCP code > s2)improved timers > s3)easier integration with SEMS/SERWEB > > I have tried to be as opbjective as possible (but everyone knows it's > almost impossible) and it would be great to create a common place to > share experiences with both projects as someone has proposed but I > guess everyone is really really busy right now... > > Samuel. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
