At 13:36 23/11/2006, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Hi Bogdan,
/* still largely catching on emails */ .... >fact that most ser's adds-on actually followed the original roadmap of openser >(posted on the web site). Can you please make me a favor and show me evidence of what specific features have been actually followed by SER? >But I do not accuse you, because it is not your job to follow openser's >evolution, so things may escape you. > >So, let us talk about things we really know. And do not think that the >difference between ser and openser it's only about code....a project is not >only the code..it is policy and attitude and respect regarding the community. I violently agree. I fear we may be understanding something else under that, but I hope the email I posted recently hopefuly makes a fair and understandable point: http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-November/007875.html In this spirit I suggest folks really begin to be serious about what they post. I think marvellous achievements like openser doc or ottendorf overhaul should not be dragged by discussions which are just not worth it. >Definitely we will try to consider the things you found unjust (like >mentioning the project along the contributor's name). We do not want to bother >anybody - in fact you probably notice that from openser side there was no >negative posts (about ser) on the mailing list or web - just the truth with >your own words. I really do not understand your attitude :(. I think the questions are coming from my Nov-22 email (http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2006-November/031423.html) --you might have possibly missed that, because my emails didn't quite make it to openser archives. Looking forward to your consideration results, -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
