Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
I would say yes...maybe adding 16 for safety reasons ;).
Good idea, but I was just looking at client_nat_test of mediaproxy module, not nat_uac_test of nathelper.
To avoid confusions like that, I'd generally propose to rip out the nat-traversal stuff (client_nat_test, fix_contact) from mediaproxy, because it does exactly the same as the corresponding nathelper functions (nat_uac_test and fix_nated_contact). I don't see the point of having redundant code here.
what about "intelligent" ALGs on the path?
As noted before, customers are strongly advised not to use any. I guess, you all know why ;o) And there's no other point on the path where an ALG not under customer's or our control could be placed in this specific deployment.
Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
