Hi Klaus,
this issue is documented in the TM readme - see the link to the TM
parameter.
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Great! Are there performance issues due to the locking in the reply
route?
regards
klaus
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi everybody,
The ability of accessing/processing AVPs in reply route was a long
debated and wanted functionality. Finally, OpenSER 1.2.x fixes this.
The new code allows two types of behaviours:
- use per message AVPs in reply route - no special synchronization
is needed, but there is no persistence outside reply route.
- use per transaction AVPS in reply route (as in failure route).
the above behaviours apply to the reply routes triggered by TM. You
can control this via the new TM parameter "onreply_avp_mode":
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN303
in default reply route only per message AVPs will be available.
regards,
bogdan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
