Hi Klaus I've not actually tested Mediaproxy my self on SMP, but I have found this with other applications and Python.
Mike Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > Mike O'Connor wrote: >> Hi Tung >> >> As you know Mediaproxy is written in Python, Python does not really >> support proper threading as it still has a global lock on the data >> dictionary. >> >> This means that a SMP machine really does not help in fact because of >> the CPU switching it will probable perform to a lower level. > > Does this really cause a performance drop from 420 to 50 sessions? > > regards > klaus > >> >> I would switch your machines make your test machine your production and >> then buy a second machine of the same spec and use the SRV record load >> balancing to give you both higher performance and redundancy. >> >> All in all your better off having 3 or 4 machine than one machine in the >> long term any :) >> >> Cheers >> Mike >> >> >> >> Tung Tran wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've tested the performance of mediaproxy as below: >>> >>> 1/ PC1: Single P4, 2.4Ghz , 1GB memory, it can handle 420 sessions >>> using rtpgenerator with g729. (testing server) >>> 2/ PC2: Dual-xeon 3Ghz, 2GB memory, but it just can handle about 50 >>> sessions when I use rtpgenerator with g729. (production server) >>> >>> Should anybody can help me to customize my production server to handle >>> more sessions. >>> >>> Thanks and regards >>> >>> Tung. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@openser.org >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users