I think that the message the most important is: after_loose: No next URI found
It cannot find the next URI...
What should I change in my configuration..?
0(2091) SIP Request:
0(2091) method: <BYE>
0(2091) uri: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1027>
0(2091) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(2091) parse_headers: flags=2
0(2091) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5748026460769314710>; state=16
0(2091) end of header reached, state=5
0(2091) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(2091) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(2091) After parse_msg...
0(2091) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(2091) parse_headers: flags=100
0(2091) DEBUG: add_param: tag=c0a80101-22a2095
0(2091) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(2091) DBUG:parse_to: display={}, ruri={sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone}
0(2091) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [67]; uri=[sip:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone]
0(2091) DEBUG: to body [<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone>]
0(2091) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <2> <BYE>
0(2091) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(2091) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 10
0(2091) !!!!!!!!! NAT UAC TEST 19 SUCEDEED
0(2091) parse_headers: flags=80
0(2091) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(2091) found end of header
0(2091) DEBUG: add_param: tag=c0a80101-a5c455
0(2091) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(2091) DBUG:parse_to: display={"101"}, ruri={sip:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone}
0(2091) parse_headers: flags=200
0(2091) is_preloaded: No
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==12 && [82.127.0.79] ==
[88.191.45.91]
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 1027
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==12 && [82.127.0.79] ==
[88.191.45.91]
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 1027
0(2091) DEBUG:check_self: host != me
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [88.191.45.91] ==
[88.191.45.91]
0(2091) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2091) after_loose: Topmost route URI:
'sip:88.191.45.91:5060;lr=on;ftag=c0a80101-a5c455' is me
0(2091) parse_headers: flags=200
0(2091) found end of header
0(2091) find_next_route: No next Route HF found
0(2091) after_loose: No next URI found
0(2091) DBG:rr:run_rr_callbacks: callback id 0 entered with
<lr=on;ftag=c0a80101-a5c455>
Dan-Cristian Bogos a écrit :
> Hi Marc,
>
> it will help more if u will post full dialog from INVITE to BYE coming
> in and out from the server. It is important to check whether openser
> forwards the BYEs and if the end party listens on that port.
>
> Cheers,
> DanB
>
> On 8/2/07, Marc LEURENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> STUN seems to be working
>>
>> In openserctl ul show, I have:
>> AOR:: 103 Contact:: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1028;user=phone Q=
>> AOR:: 101 Contact:: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1313;user=phone Q=
>>
>>
>> And tcpdump -i eth0 -n port 5060 returns:
>> 13:47:44.375374 IP 88.191.45.91.5060 > 82.127.0.79.1027: SIP, length: 241
>> 13:47:44.375396 IP 88.191.45.91.5060 > 82.127.0.79.1312: SIP, length: 241
>> 13:47:44.422471 IP 82.127.0.79.1027 > 88.191.45.91.5060: SIP, length: 276
>> 13:47:44.426415 IP 82.127.0.79.1312 > 88.191.45.91.5060: SIP, length: 275
>>
>>
>> And my ngrep returns
>>
>>
>> #
>> U 88.191.45.91:5060 -> 82.127.0.79:1027
>> OPTIONS sip:82.127.0.79:1027 SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.191.45.91:5060;branch=0.
>> From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=7ad21f92.
>> To: sip:82.127.0.79:1027.
>> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>> Content-Length: 0.
>> .
>>
>> #
>> U 88.191.45.91:5060 -> 82.127.0.79:1312
>> OPTIONS sip:82.127.0.79:1312 SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.191.45.91:5060;branch=0.
>> From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=8ad21f92.
>> To: sip:82.127.0.79:1312.
>> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>> Content-Length: 0.
>> .
>>
>> #
>> U 82.127.0.79:1027 -> 88.191.45.91:5060
>> SIP/2.0 481 CallLeg/Transaction Does Not Exist.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.191.45.91:5060;branch=0.
>> From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=7ad21f92.
>> To: <sip:82.127.0.79:1027>;tag=c0a80101-1db9be2.
>> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>> Content-Length: 0.
>> .
>>
>> #
>> U 82.127.0.79:1312 -> 88.191.45.91:5060
>> SIP/2.0 481 CallLeg/Transaction Does Not Exist.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 88.191.45.91:5060;branch=0.
>> From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=8ad21f92.
>> To: <sip:82.127.0.79:1312>;tag=c0a80101-573ff0.
>> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>> Content-Length: 0.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit :
>>> El Thursday 02 August 2007 12:25:07 Marc LEURENT escribió:
>>>> #
>>>> U 82.127.0.79:1312 -> 88.191.45.91:5060
>>>> BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1027 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 82.127.0.79:1313;branch=z9hG4bK8030359792092547043.
>>>> From: "101"<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone>;tag=c0a80101-4c5eed.
>>>> To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone>;tag=c0a80101-1d0bb0d.
>>>> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> CSeq: 2 BYE.
>>>> Max-Forwards: 70.
>>>> Route: <sip:88.191.45.91:5060;lr=on;ftag=c0a80101-4c5eed>.
>>>> User-Agent: THOMSON ST2030 hw0 fw1.50 00-0E-50-4E-AF-AE.
>>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>> What more is after this message?
>>> Did you try tcpdump to monitorize to with IP:port are the messages sent?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
