El Thursday 11 October 2007 18:05:12 Alan Crosswell escribió: > We are running pua_bla in production with Polycom phones. BLA and BLF > are basically the same term. The protocol used is based on a draft RFC > (draft-anil-sipping-bla which is now in the BLISS IETF group).
Hum, how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same? In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog". Have you debugged what kind of REGISTER's and SUBSCRIBER's send you Polycom with your pua_bla module? Thanks for any explanation. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
