El Friday 26 October 2007 14:27:36 Aymeric Moizard escribió: > I just read this interesting compliance question. Here is my > *own* opinion: > > First: from rfc: "the To tag of the response to the CANCEL and the To tag > in the response to the original request SHOULD be the same" > > -> Thus, there is no reason to send the tag from a provisionnal response > in the CANCEL answer. THIS IS ONLY FOR FINAL RESPONSE (the 487), never > PROVISIONNAL (180 or 183). (However, the tag is always the same on > endpoints, but still this is not true on proxy). That's how I understand > it. > > -> SHOULD means that it's not mandatory. So if one application like > asterisk tries to match the To tag of CANCEL answer and the to tag of a > final response then this application is NOT compliant to rfc3261. > > openser is not guilty there... > asterisk is certainly not "too much RFC compliant"...
Thanks for your explanation. I'll try to report the bug in Asterisk. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
