Daniel Pittman wrote: > Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Is the same setup working without openvz? Have you used multicast >>before? Multicast is a bit complex to set up, requires support from >>routers/switches etc., so this might well be not openvz-related. But >>we setting up this test case right now to check ourselfes. >> >>Can you please also provide a bit more information about your >>configuration like whether you use bridge for veth-eth0 traffic >>bridging or routed networking, any configuration options (including >>sysctl) you used/changed etc.? > > > One thing that is worth noting: I found a bug in the ... veth code, I > think, where it wouldn't pass a multicast packet through. The code > checked with the 'is_broadcast' flag, for a matching mac, and assumed > that anything else was not for this host.
plz make sure you really use and look at the sources of 028stab039 kernel. this check in veth_xmit() was fixed in 028stab034 with this commit: http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.18-openvz;a=commitdiff;h=993241dcdfc8ae22d339e08ed78db6e9760b1d89 > > Perhaps this is a similar issue? I can try to dig out the fault report > if it helps, but at the time it was simply changing is_broadcast to > include an is_multicast test on the Ethernet MAC. and it started to work? Thanks, Kirill _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
