2009/9/30 Vitaliy Gusev <vgu...@openvz.org> > On Wednesday 30 September 2009 01:52:14 pm Anthony - wrote: > > 2009/9/30 Vitaliy Gusev <vgu...@openvz.org> > > > > > On Wednesday 30 September 2009 12:13:39 pm Anthony - wrote: > > > > > > Ok, I will ivestigate this. But why /var/lock is mounted twice in VE > > > (before chkpnt) ? > > > > > > > I don't know, I just rebooted and started the vm and it is mounted twice > > again. > > > > I lloked at /proc/mounts on the host and here is the diff between > > before-chkpnt and after-restore: > > > > < proc /proc proc rw 0 0 > > < sysfs /sys sysfs rw 0 0 > > < tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,mode=755 0 0 > > < tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw 0 0 > > < devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > > < tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 > > < tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,mode=755 0 0 > > < tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw 0 0 > > --- > > > none /proc proc rw,nosuid,noexec,nodiratime 0 0 > > > none /sys sysfs rw 0 0 > > > none /var/run tmpfs rw 0 0 > > > none /var/lock tmpfs rw 0 0 > > > none /dev/pts devpts rw,mode=600 0 0 > > > none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 > > > none /var/run tmpfs rw 0 0 > > > simfs /var/lock simfs rw 0 0 > > > > none of these are mounted back in the same mount type. Do you have any > hints > > on this ? > > It is ok. They are nodev filesystems, therefore first parameter is ignored. > > > > > > > > > As workaround you can do "umount /va/lock". > > > > > > > on the host, here is what I did : > > > > r...@vzhost:/# umount /var/lock > > umount in VE. > > sorry my mistake, I did it in the VE but wrote "host" by mistake. I got the error
umount: simfs: not found umount: /var/lock: not mounted but cat /proc/mounts still shows simfs /var/lock simfs rw 0 0
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
