> > I don't know, but I would consider the real competition to be between > OpenVZ and libvirt/KVM - I don't think Xen is going anywhere in the long > term. > > KVM supports the use of kernel-same-page-merging (KSM), which OpenVZ > doesn't (yet?). For some applications KSM can be a big win... > > We currently use/support both OpenVZ and kvm. > > Tim. > > > Thanks Tim ... from a pure performance standpoint, I'd imagine that any kind of emulation/virtualization would have an overhead which is more than openvz . So, if the usecase does not involve running different kernels, then openvz style partitioning of system resources would yield more performance. I am looking for more evidence supporting that :)
Regards, Kashyap
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
