I am actually planning on using it only on test systems where i have commodity SATA disks that are getting a bit overwhelmed. I hope to get better value from a SATA+SSD combination that I would with SAS disks and the appropriate controllers and fancy RAID levels that cost 3 times more at least.
Anyway, looks like that bug also got fixed in 092.1, at least it doesn't oops immediately any more. Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi all! > > I thought it's really not good idea because technology like ssd > caching should be tested _thoroughly_ before production use. But you > could try it with simfs but beware of ploop because it's really not > an standard ext4 with custom caches and unexpected behaviour in some > cases. > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic > <aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is anyone using flashcache vith openvz? If so, which version and with >> which kernel? Versions lower than 3 do not compile against the latest >> el6 kernel and version 3.11 and the latest git oopses in >> flashcache_md_write_kickoff with a null pointer. >> >> I see provisions to detect ovz kernel source in flashcache makefile, so >> someone must be compiling and using it. >> >> Any other SSD caching software that works with openvz? >> >> regards, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@openvz.org >> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users