I apologize for the duplicate message. I forgot that I had already sent a message before.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:52 AM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT < pauloco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why suggest LXC when we have OpenVZ 7? LXC is far behind, it has less > features, it's more insecure, has a network standard that is a nightmare, > etc. > > I stopped using proxmox from the exact moment it removed OpenVZ support > and replaced it with LXC. > > Now a happy customer with Virtuozzo 7 (the same as OpenVZ 7) using > multiple NVMe drives with zero issues for almost 2 years. > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:42 AM Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net> > wrote: > >> Definitely we'll not migrate to Proxmox because it's suboptimal writing >> this in OpenDocument format from an HTML5 interface. >> >> >> El 28/4/19 a les 14:37, spameden ha escrit: >> > No. It's impossible to use OpenVZ 6 with kernel 4.x, unless you put lots >> > of effort to port their patches over the fresh kernel. >> > >> > The latest OpenVZ 6 kernel is 2.6.32-openvz-042stab136.1-amd64 and there >> > is an issue with discard (it doesn't work). >> > >> > The discard issue has been fixed in 3.1-mainline kernel I think, you can >> > look over newish RHEL kernel and try to port those changes to the old >> > legacy OpenVZ 6 kernel. >> > >> > Regarding 4.x kernel: >> > I'm using Proxmox with 4.x kernel (there is no OpenVZ) - only LXC >> > containers and KVM - and there is no issue with discards at all. >> > and what I also meant is: that you can easily migrate your existing >> > OpenVZ containers to the Proxmox. >> > >> > Proxmox is based on latest Debian Stretch and specifically designed as a >> > distro for contrainers. >> > It has GUI, networking support (including openvswitch and other), >> > KVM/LXC support and many other things (e.g. ceph/glusterfs support). >> > >> > Though, reading you again you've mentioned that you need a specific >> > simfs quota in containers: >> > most likely that would be impossible for unprivileged containers with >> > directory storage (simfs analogue), althrough you could use qcow2 or >> > LVM-based storage for containers. >> > >> > >> > вс, 28 апр. 2019 г. в 09:47, Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net >> > <mailto:informat...@actiu.net>>: >> > >> > El 27/4/19 a les 22:15, spameden ha escrit: >> > > >> > > сб, 27 апр. 2019 г. в 20:16, Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net >> > <mailto:informat...@actiu.net> >> > > <mailto:informat...@actiu.net <mailto:informat...@actiu.net>>>: >> > > >> > > I responded about OpenVZ/6 vs LXC, and Proxmox doesn't solve >> > the Discard >> > > >> > > >> > > What do you mean it doesn't solve the issue with discard? It does. >> > > >> > > Discard is perfectly working on Proxmox kernel 4.15.18-12-pve or >> > even on >> > > 4.13 kernel on DM-Crypt/LUKS setup. >> > > >> > > I'm using on all my servers DM-Crypt/LUKS + LVM so I know what I'm >> > > talking about. >> > >> > Are you really using OpenVZ 6 with Linux kernel 4.x? >> > Did you see any difficult with Discard when using other context with >> > Linux 4.x ? >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list >> > Users@openvz.org <mailto:Users@openvz.org> >> > https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Users mailing list >> > Users@openvz.org >> > https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@openvz.org >> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users