----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tomasz Torcz" <to...@pipebreaker.pl> > To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <asegu...@redhat.com> > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:19:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Users] libteam network devices support in ovirt > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 03:34:03PM +0100, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:24 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Little over a year ago Fedora introduced alternative bonding driver > > > for network devices - libteam: https://fedorahosted.org/libteam/ > > > Can we expect libteam support in ovirt at the same level as for "bond" > > > driver? Currently, libteam bonded interfaces are not visible in > > > "Setup Host Networks" dialog. > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > We are aware of libteam bonds and I personally look forward to them very > > much. > > > > The ideal way to support them would be via one new network configurator > > that > > would implicitly make teamd bonds instead of usual bonds. After the > > iproute2 > > configurator is finished (it is currently in progress but quite functional) > > it > > should be quite easy to inherit from vdsm/netconf/iproute2.py and modify > > configureBond, removeBond and editBondings so that they make use of teamd > > bonds. > > What needs to be done to get ”minimal” support? By minimal I understand > oVirt acknowledging that network interfaces are teamed. Configuring teams > from oVirt can come later. Right now teamed interfaces are displayed > as separate in net configuration dialog, and master team device is not > displayed at all. I could live with manually configure teams if only > I can attach them to ovirt networks.
would that be a bridged or a bridgeless network? A vlanned or non-vlanned network? > > -- > Tomasz Torcz ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded > processor.'' > xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl -- Mitchell Blank on LKML > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users