On 11/07/2013 12:00 PM, Sander Grendelman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Martijn Grendelman
<martijn.grendel...@isaac.nl> wrote:
So is qemu-kvm-rhev from mentioned source RPM a drop-in replacement for
qemu-kvm from CentOS ? Would it make sense to install it instead of
qemu-kvm?
That's the way it worked for me.
- Put one host in maintenance
- Install *-rhev packas on that host
yum localinstall qemu-*rhev*.rpm)
this replaces the regular packages:
Nov 06 16:15:38 Installed: 2:qemu-img-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
Nov 06 16:15:40 Installed: 2:qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
Nov 06 16:15:40 Installed:
2:qemu-kvm-rhev-tools-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.9.x86_64
Nov 06 16:15:40 Erased: qemu-kvm-tools
Nov 06 16:15:41 Erased: qemu-kvm
Nov 06 16:15:41 Erased: qemu-img
- Restart vdsm, enable host migrate test VM to host, test live storage
migration: OK
- Put host back in maintenance and reboot.
- Activate host and repeat maintenance/installation steps with other hosts.
The "solution" for the live snaphost problem as proposed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009100 is:
|BZ| Vdsm should check (hopefully via libvirt) if the underlying
qemu supports live snapshot, and report this feature to Engine.
|BZ| If it does not, block this feature in UI.
That is something that should be implemented, however, there should
also be some way to use a full-featured kvm with oVirt.
Can oVirt carry the qemu-*rhev* packages?
Or is this something that should be in epel? Or CentOS?
I think worth veryfing with centos first on their plans to carry this
package before we carry (and maintain it) in ovirt repos.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
