Il 12/11/2013 10:34, Patrick Hurrelmann ha scritto: > Hi all, > > sorry for this rant, but... > > I now tried several times to test the beta 3.3.1 rpms, but they can't > even be installed in the most times.
I'm glad to read you're testing 3.3.1. May I ask you to add yourself to http://www.ovirt.org/Testing/Ovirt_3.3.1_testing ? > One time it required a future > selinux-policy, although the needed selinux fix was delivered in a much > lower version. Now the rpms have broken requirements. It requires > "hostname" instead of "/bin/hostname". This broken requirement is not > included in the vdsm 3.3 branch, so I wonder where it comes from? > Anyway. So I proceeded and tried to build vdsm myself once again. > Currently the build fails with (but worked fine some days ago): > > /usr/bin/pep8 --exclude="config.py,constants.py" --filename '*.py,*.py.in' \ > client lib/cpopen/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py lib/vdsm/*.py.in tests > vds_bootstrap vdsm-tool vdsm/*.py vdsm/*.py.in vdsm/netconf > vdsm/sos/vdsm.py.in vdsm/storage vdsm/vdsm vdsm_api vdsm_hooks vdsm_reg > vdsm/storage/imageRepository/formatConverter.py:280:29: E128 > continuation line under-indented for visual indent > > > - How can the quality of the vdsm builds be increased? It is frustrating > to spend time on testing and then the hosts cannot even be installed to > broken vdsm rpms. > - How are the builds prepared? Is there a Jenkins job that prepares > "stable" rpms in addition to the nightly job? Or is this totally > handcrafted? > - How can it be that the rpm spec differs between the 3.3 branch and > released rpms? What is the source/branch for el6 vdsm rpms? Maybe I'm > just tracking on the wrong source tree... Since this is VDSM related, adding vdsm-devel list to the discussion. > > Thx and Regards > Patrick > > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users