I did not run into this problem at all ( neither on my cos6.4 nor on my 6.5 hosts ). The "virtual-host" profile was chosen automatically, installation of vdsm was literally as simple as adding the following lines in the %post section of my kickstart file:
rpm -ivh http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm rpm -ivh http://mirror.1000mbps.com/fedora-epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm yum -y update epel-release yum -y install vdsm On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Ted Miller <tmil...@hcjb.org> wrote: > I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts. > > One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the > time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning, > so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of > people are probably missing it. > > When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a > "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I > substituted the "virtual-host" profile. > > I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293, > where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + > RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + > RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate. > > My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses > "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls > back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are > between the two profiles.) > > Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path? > > Ted Miller > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
