We can't turn off the memory balloon option because we are running the
3.3.2 with the bug of the memory balloon. Thx for the help!
On Feb 13, 2014 10:51 AM, "Doron Fediuck" <dfedi...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "René Koch" <rk...@linuxland.at>
> > To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfedi...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Koen Vanoppen" <vanoppen.k...@gmail.com>, users@ovirt.org, "Martin
> Sivak" <msi...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:16:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Users] Memory usage
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 03:49 -0500, Doron Fediuck wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "René Koch" <rk...@linuxland.at>
> > > > To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfedi...@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: "Koen Vanoppen" <vanoppen.k...@gmail.com>, users@ovirt.org,
> "Martin
> > > > Sivak" <msi...@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 7:31:47 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Users] Memory usage
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:22 -0500, Doron Fediuck wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "René Koch" <rk...@linuxland.at>
> > > > > > To: "Koen Vanoppen" <vanoppen.k...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Cc: users@ovirt.org
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:18:37 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Users] Memory usage
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 15:14 +0100, Koen Vanoppen wrote:
> > > > > > > In The GUI, it says it's using 25% of the memory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess it's the real value, right?
> > > > > > The same happened for the memcached vm, someone reported to me -
> > > > > > negative value in REST-API, but correct graph in oVirt webadmin
> GUI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I fear I have no idea how this can happen - so maybe someone
> else can
> > > > > > help you troubleshoot this issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2014-02-12 15:10 GMT+01:00 Koen Vanoppen <
> vanoppen.k...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > >         Thanks for the quick respons, but there is no memcached
> > > > > > >         running on that VM.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >         Kind regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >         2014-02-12 15:06 GMT+01:00 René Koch <
> rk...@linuxland.at>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >                 On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:55 +0100, Koen
> Vanoppen
> > > > > > >                 wrote:
> > > > > > >                 > Dear all,
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > When we monitor one of our machines, we
> noticed
> > > > > > >                 > that
> > > > > > >                 there was one vm
> > > > > > >                 > that was constantly giving a error of memory
> > > > > > >                 > usage.
> > > > > > >                 But when we took a
> > > > > > >                 > look at it, there is actually nothing wrong
> with
> > > > > > >                 > it.
> > > > > > >                 Now we looked
> > > > > > >                 > furhter then that. We looked at the API of
> the
> > > > > > >                 machine and noticed
> > > > > > >                 > something very strange:
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > <statistic
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >
> href="/api/vms/3b9aa245-75ff-42e8-b921-1c9ce61826bf/statistics/b7499508-c1c3-32f0-8174-c1783e57bb08"
> > > > > > >
> id="b7499508-c1c3-32f0-8174-c1783e57bb08"><name>memory.used</name><description>Memory
> > > > > > >                 used (agent)</description><values
> > > > > > >
> type="INTEGER"><value><datum>-944892806</datum></value></values><type>GAUGE</type><unit>BYTES</unit>
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > It's a negative...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >                 Do you have memcached running in this vm?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >                 I heard about this issue with memcached, but
> never
> > > > > > >                 tested memcached in
> > > > > > >                 my oVirt environment. You get the real usage
> value
> > > > > > >                 with
> > > > > > >                 memory.used = memory.installed + memory.used
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >                 Regards,
> > > > > > >                 René
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > What could be the problem?
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > Kind regards,
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >                 > koen
> > > > > > >                 >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Guys,
> > > > > these values are usually a result of overcommitment mechanism
> usage.
> > > > > For example, if KSM is effective, it will free a lot of memory
> pages,
> > > > > and total-free-committed becomes negative.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for the information.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This was reported in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977758
> > > > > and the engine is using memFree reported by vdsm, which is more
> > > > > accurate.
> > > > >
> > > > > The API reports the old version due to backwards compatibility.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I just had a look at the bugzilla report and the RHEV documentation
> > > > which says "Current memory in bytes used by the virtual machine.".
> > > > So this means, the reported values are totally useless for monitoring
> > > > memory usage of a virtual machine if KSM is active. I would expect to
> > > > get the memory usage of a virtual machine and not how much memory is
> > > > consumed on the hypervisor (this is pretty useless information for
> me).
> > > >
> > > > Is it planned to report the memory usage in a virtual machine in the
> API
> > > > as well?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > René
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > René,
> > > started digging into this, but it may take some time.
> > >
> > > Note that there are 2 memory usage reports; one for the host,
> > > and another for each VM.
> > > My response is related to the host, while the original question was
> > > for the VM. I still think the root cause is the same (ie- related to
> > > overcommitment; for example the VM may have a balloon inflated), but
> > > would like to properly check and fix if needed.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I know. So my question was if we can add another value for the
> > usage in the vm in addition to the usage of the vm on the host.
> >
> We'll know once we understand the cause- ie is it a bug needs fixing or
> should we indeed add another value
>
> If you have a setup with this issue, try removing the balloon device
> and see if it helps / changes.
>
> >
> > >
> > > In order to make sure we keep track of it, please open a bug with all
> the
> > > relevant info.
> > >
> >
> > I'll open a bug for this.
> >
> Thanks
>
> >
> > > Thanks and keep reporting!
> > > Doron
> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to