----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michal Skrivanek" <mskri...@redhat.com> > To: "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> > Cc: d...@redhat.com, "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>, "Maurice James" > <midnightst...@msn.com>, "Ofer Blaut" > <obl...@redhat.com>, "Users@ovirt.org Users" <users@ovirt.org> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:12:26 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration > > > On Feb 27, 2014, at 08:15 , Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Dafna Ron" <d...@redhat.com> > >> To: "Maurice James" <midnightst...@msn.com> > >> Cc: "Ofer Blaut" <obl...@redhat.com>, users@ovirt.org > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 7:34:11 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration > >> > >> On 02/26/2014 05:24 PM, Maurice James wrote: > >>> I have a specific interface set up for migrations. Why do disk > >>> migrations not use the interface that I have set for migrations? Is > >>> that by design? Shouldnt it use the interfaces that I have set aside > >>> for migrations? VM migrations work as they should but not disk migrations > >> > >> I don't think that you can configure interface for disk migration. > >> Disk migration is actually copy of information from the original disk to > >> a new disk created on a new domain + delete of the original disk once > >> that is done. > >> it's not actually a migration and so I am not sure you can actually > >> configure an interface for that. > >> adding ofer - perhpas he has a solution or it's possible and I am not > >> aware of it. > > > > I guess that *not* using the migration network for storage operation is > > the expected behavior, to make migration faster and safer. > > > > Michal, Dan, can you elaborate on this? > > with storage offloading it's probably not going to be significant, however > today it likely is. > Nir, why would not using migration network make it better? Won't we have the > same problem as before without migration network at all, i.e. choking the > management channel?
Gigs of data sent of the same netowrk used for migarations would make migration slower when the network is saturated. > Should we maybe consider a dedicated "storage" network? This can be setup now in 3.4. Sergey, can you explain how this is configured now in 3.4? _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users