----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com> > To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbona...@redhat.com>, de...@ovirt.org, > fsimo...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com > Cc: "Sven Kieske" <s.kie...@mittwald.de>, "users" <users@ovirt.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:21:18 PM > Subject: Building vdsm within Fedora > > Since Vdsm was open-sourced, it was built and deployed via > Fedora. > > Recently [http://gerrit.ovirt.org/31214] vdsm introduced a spec-file > dependency onf qemu-kvm-rhev, and considered to backport it to the > ovirt-3.4 brach. > > Requiring qemu-kvm-rhev, which is not part of Fedora's EPEL6 branch, > violates Fedora's standards. > > So basically we have two options: > > 1. Revert the qemu-kvm-rhev dependency. > 2. Drop vdsm from EPEL6 (or completely from Fedora); ship Vdsm only > within the oVirt repositories. > > A third option would be to have one rpm, with qemu-kvm-rhev, shipped in > ovirt, and another without it - shipped in Fedora. I find this overly > complex and confusing.
I think that until now (centos6) we were using qemu-kvm/qemu-img in the spec file and then the ovirt repository was distributing qemu-*-rhev from: http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.4-snapshot/rpm/el6/x86_64/ It this not possible with centos7? Any problem with that? I find being in fedora a way to keep the spec file and the rpm updated and as clean as possible. -- Federico _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
