Il 09/11/2014 00:00, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>> I've not tested all-in-one upgrade, just to be sure, save current >>> iptables config and do a backup before starting the upgrade. >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Gianluca >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sandro Bonazzola >>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >>> See how it works at redhat.com >>> >> >> >> trying to proceed with migration to f20. >> >> > [snip] > > >> But I get this with "yum distro-sync" >> >> what does it mean? >> >> [root@tekkaman sysconfig]# yum distro-sync >> >> [snip] > >> --> Running transaction check >> ---> Package SLOF.noarch 0:0.1.git20121018-1.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package SLOF.noarch 0:0.1.git20130430-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package ipxe-roms-qemu.noarch 0:20130517-2.gitc4bce43.fc19 will be a >> downgrade >> ---> Package ipxe-roms-qemu.noarch 0:20130517-3.gitc4bce43.fc19 will be >> erased >> ---> Package libcacard.x86_64 2:1.4.2-15.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package libcacard.x86_64 2:1.6.1-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package openbios.noarch 0:1.0.svn1063-2.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package openbios.noarch 0:1.1.svn1198-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package qemu.x86_64 2:1.4.2-15.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package qemu.x86_64 2:1.6.1-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package qemu-common.x86_64 2:1.4.2-15.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package qemu-common.x86_64 2:1.6.1-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package qemu-img.x86_64 2:1.4.2-15.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package qemu-img.x86_64 2:1.6.1-2.fc19 will be erased >> ---> Package qemu-kvm.x86_64 2:1.4.2-15.fc19 will be a downgrade >> ---> Package qemu-kvm.x86_64 2:1.6.1-2.fc19 will be erased >> > > > In practice the problem is due to the fact that it is an all-in-one > installation and so it pulled in the virt-preview part for vdsm and related > packages (qemu-kvm, seabioes, etc..). > How much is it risky to bypass the "yum distro-sync" step? Will the fedup > part run itself the distro-sync command then, or is it only a sort of > pre-check to verify consistency of packages? > In my case if fedup will retain the ovirt repos all should go ok, correct?
I think it should go ok. > > Gianluca > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users