On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:11:54AM +0200, Roderick Mooi wrote:
> Hi
> 
> > It is not removed. Can you try 'gluster volume set volname 
> > cluster.eager-lock enable`?
> 
> This works. BTW by default this setting is “on”

Thanks for reporting back!

> What’s the difference between “on” and “enable”?

Both are the same, you could also use "yes", "true" and possibly others.

Cheers,
Niels


> 
> Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Roderick
> 
> > On 06 Apr 2016, at 10:56 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 04/06/2016 02:08 PM, Roderick Mooi wrote:
> >> Hi Ravi and colleagues
> >> 
> >> (apologies for hijacking this thread but I’m not sure where else to report 
> >> this (and it is related).)
> >> 
> >> With gluster 3.7.10, running
> >> #gluster volume set <volname> group virt
> >> fails with:
> >> volume set: failed: option : eager-lock does not exist
> >> Did you mean eager-lock?
> >> 
> >> I had to remove the eager-lock setting from /var/lib/glusterd/groups/virt 
> >> to get this to work. It seems like setting eager-lock has been removed 
> >> from latest gluster. Is this correct? Either way, is there anything else I 
> >> should do?
> > 
> > It is not removed. Can you try 'gluster volume set volname 
> > cluster.eager-lock enable`?
> > I think the disperse (EC) translator introduced a `disperse.eager-lock` 
> > which is why you would need to mention entire volume option name to avoid 
> > ambiguity.
> > We probably need to fix the virt profile setting to include the entire 
> > name. By the way 'gluster volume set help` should give you the list of all 
> > options.
> > 
> > -Ravi
> > 
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> 
> >> Roderick
> >> 
> >>> On 12 Feb 2016, at 6:18 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com 
> >>> <mailto:ravishan...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Bill,
> >>> Can you enable virt-profile setting for your volume and see if that 
> >>> helps? You need to enable this optimization when you create the volume 
> >>> using ovrit, or use the following command for an existing volume:
> >>> 
> >>> #gluster volume set <volname> group virt
> >>> 
> >>> -Ravi
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On 02/12/2016 05:22 AM, Bill James wrote:
> >>>> My apologies, I'm showing how much of a noob I am.
> >>>> Ignore last direct to gluster numbers, as that wasn't really glusterfs.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> [root@ovirt2 test ~]# mount -t glusterfs ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>> <http://ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gv1 /mnt/tmp/
> >>>> [root@ovirt2 test ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmp/testfile2 bs=1M 
> >>>> count=1000 oflag=direct
> >>>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 65.8596 s, 15.9 MB/s
> >>>> 
> >>>> That's more how I expected, it is pointing to glusterfs performance.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 02/11/2016 03:27 PM, Bill James wrote:
> >>>>> don't know if it helps, but I ran a few more tests, all from the same 
> >>>>> hardware node.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> The VM:
> >>>>> [root@billjov1 ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1M 
> >>>>> count=1000 oflag=direct
> >>>>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 62.5535 s, 16.8 MB/s
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Writing directly to gluster volume:
> >>>>> [root@ovirt2 test ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero 
> >>>>> of=/gluster-store/brick1/gv1/testfile bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
> >>>>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 9.92048 s, 106 MB/s
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Writing to NFS volume:
> >>>>> [root@ovirt2 test ~]# time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/storage/qa/testfile 
> >>>>> bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
> >>>>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 10.5776 s, 99.1 MB/s
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> NFS & Gluster are using the same interface. Tests were not run at same 
> >>>>> time.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> This would suggest my problem isn't glusterfs, but the VM performance.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On 02/11/2016 03:13 PM, Bill James wrote:
> >>>>>> xml attached. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 02/11/2016 12:28 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: 
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Bill James  
> >>>>>>> <mailto:bill.ja...@j2.com><bill.ja...@j2.com> 
> >>>>>>> <mailto:bill.ja...@j2.com> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>> thank you for the reply. 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> We setup gluster using the names associated with  NIC 2 IP. 
> >>>>>>>>   Brick1: ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>> <http://ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>>   Brick2: ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>> <http://ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>>   Brick3: ovirt3-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>> <http://ovirt3-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> That's NIC 2's IP. 
> >>>>>>>> Using 'iftop -i eno2 -L 5 -t' : 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct 
> >>>>>>>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 68.0714 s, 15.4 MB/s 
> >>>>>>> Can you share the xml of this vm? You can find it in vdsm log, 
> >>>>>>> at the time you start the vm. 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Or you can do (on the host): 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> # virsh 
> >>>>>>> virsh # list 
> >>>>>>> (username: vdsm@ovirt password: shibboleth) 
> >>>>>>> virsh # dumpxml vm-id 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Peak rate (sent/received/total):                      281Mb 5.36Mb 
> >>>>>>>> 282Mb 
> >>>>>>>> Cumulative (sent/received/total):                    1.96GB 14.6MB 
> >>>>>>>> 1.97GB 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> gluster volume info gv1: 
> >>>>>>>>   Options Reconfigured: 
> >>>>>>>>   performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB 
> >>>>>>>>   performance.readdir-ahead: on 
> >>>>>>>>   performance.cache-size: 1GB 
> >>>>>>>>   performance.write-behind: off 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> performance.write-behind: off didn't help. 
> >>>>>>>> Neither did any other changes I've tried. 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> There is no VM traffic on this VM right now except my test. 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On 02/10/2016 11:55 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Ravishankar N  
> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:ravishan...@redhat.com><ravishan...@redhat.com> 
> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:ravishan...@redhat.com> 
> >>>>>>>>> wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>> +gluster-users 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> Does disabling 'performance.write-behind' give a better 
> >>>>>>>>>> throughput? 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> On 02/10/2016 11:06 PM, Bill James wrote: 
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm setting up a ovirt cluster using glusterfs and noticing not 
> >>>>>>>>>>> stellar 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe my setup could use some adjustments? 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3 hardware nodes running centos7.2, glusterfs 3.7.6.1, ovirt 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.6.2.6-1. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Each node has 8 spindles configured in 1 array which is split 
> >>>>>>>>>>> using LVM 
> >>>>>>>>>>> with one logical volume for system and one for gluster. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> They each have 4 NICs, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>    NIC1 = ovirtmgmt 
> >>>>>>>>>>>    NIC2 = gluster  (1GbE) 
> >>>>>>>>> How do you ensure that gluster trafic is using this nic? 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>    NIC3 = VM traffic 
> >>>>>>>>> How do you ensure that vm trafic is using this nic? 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> I tried with default glusterfs settings 
> >>>>>>>>> And did you find any difference? 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> and also with: 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 1GB 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> [root@ovirt3 test scripts]# gluster volume info gv1 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Volume Name: gv1 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Type: Replicate 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Volume ID: 71afc35b-09d7-4384-ab22-57d032a0f1a2 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Status: Started 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Transport-type: tcp 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bricks: 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Brick1: ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://ovirt1-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Brick2: ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://ovirt2-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Brick3: ovirt3-ks.test.j2noc.com 
> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://ovirt3-ks.test.j2noc.com/>:/gluster-store/brick1/gv1 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Options Reconfigured: 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.cache-size: 1GB 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.readdir-ahead: on 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Using simple dd test on VM in ovirt: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>     dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct 
> >>>>>>>>> block size of 1G?! 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Try 1M (our default for storage operations) 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>         1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 65.9337 s, 16.3 MB/s 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Another VM not in ovirt using nfs: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>      dd if=/dev/zero of=/root/testfile bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct 
> >>>>>>>>>>>         1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 27.0079 s, 39.8 MB/s 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is that expected or is there a better way to set it up to get 
> >>>>>>>>>>> better 
> >>>>>>>>>>> performance? 
> >>>>>>>>> Adding Niels for advice. 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> This email, its contents and .... 
> >>>>>>>>> Please avoid this, this is a public mailing list, everything you 
> >>>>>>>>> write 
> >>>>>>>>> here is public. 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Nir 
> >>>>>>>> I'll have to look into how to remove this sig for this mailing 
> >>>>>>>> list.... 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Cloud Services for Business  <http://www.j2.com/>www.j2.com 
> >>>>>>>> <http://www.j2.com/> 
> >>>>>>>> j2 | eFax | eVoice | FuseMail | Campaigner | KeepItSafe | Onebox 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> This email, its contents and attachments contain information from j2 
> >>>>>>>> Global, 
> >>>>>>>> Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or 
> >>>>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to 
> >>>>>>>> be for 
> >>>>>>>> the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, 
> >>>>>>>> copy, 
> >>>>>>>> distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. 
> >>>>>>>> If you 
> >>>>>>>> have received this email in error please notify the sender by reply 
> >>>>>>>> e-mail 
> >>>>>>>> and delete the original message and any copies. (c) 2015 j2 Global, 
> >>>>>>>> Inc. All 
> >>>>>>>> rights reserved. eFax, eVoice, Campaigner, FuseMail, KeepItSafe, and 
> >>>>>>>> Onebox 
> >>>>>>>> are registered trademarks of j2 Global, Inc. and its affiliates. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Users mailing list
> >>>>>> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> >>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> >>>>>> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>  
> >>>>> <http://www.j2.com/?utm_source=j2global&utm_medium=xsell-referral&utm_campaign=employeeemail>
> >>>>> This email, its contents and attachments contain information from j2 
> >>>>> Global, Inc 
> >>>>> <http://www.j2.com/?utm_source=j2global&utm_medium=xsell-referral&utm_campaign=employemail>.
> >>>>>  and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or 
> >>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be 
> >>>>> for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, 
> >>>>> copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is 
> >>>>> prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the 
> >>>>> sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message and any copies. 
> >>>>> © 2015 j2 Global, Inc <http://www.j2.com/>. All rights reserved. eFax ® 
> >>>>> <http://www.efax.com/>, eVoice ® <http://www.evoice.com/>, Campaigner ® 
> >>>>> <http://www.campaigner.com/>, FuseMail ® <http://www.fusemail.com/>, 
> >>>>> KeepItSafe ® <http://www.keepitsafe.com/> and Onebox ® 
> >>>>> <http://www.onebox.com/> are r egistered trademarks of j2 Global, Inc 
> >>>>> <http://www.j2.com/>. and its affiliates.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Users mailing list
> >>>>> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> >>>>> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >>>> 
> >>>>  
> >>>> <http://www.j2.com/?utm_source=j2global&utm_medium=xsell-referral&utm_campaign=employeeemail>
> >>>> This email, its contents and attachments contain information from j2 
> >>>> Global, Inc 
> >>>> <http://www.j2.com/?utm_source=j2global&utm_medium=xsell-referral&utm_campaign=employemail>.
> >>>>  and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or 
> >>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be 
> >>>> for the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, 
> >>>> copy, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is 
> >>>> prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the 
> >>>> sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message and any copies. © 
> >>>> 2015 j2 Global, Inc <http://www.j2.com/>. All rights reserved. eFax ® 
> >>>> <http://www.efax.com/>, eVoice ® <http://www.evoice.com/>, Campaigner ® 
> >>>> <http://www.campaigner.com/>, FuseMail ® <http://www.fusemail.com/>, 
> >>>> KeepItSafe ® <http://www.keepitsafe.com/> and Onebox ® 
> >>>> <http://www.onebox.com/> are r egistered trademarks of j2 Global, Inc 
> >>>> <http://www.j2.com/>. and its affiliates.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Users mailing list
> >>>> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> >>>> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, 
> >>> e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. 
> >>> The full disclaimer details can be found at  
> >>> <http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html>http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html
> >>>  <http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html>.
> >>> 
> >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> >>> MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, 
> >>> and is believed to be clean.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
> >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> >>> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, 
> >> e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. 
> >> The full disclaimer details can be found at  
> >> <http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html>http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html
> >>  <http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html>.
> >> 
> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> >> MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, 
> >> and is believed to be clean.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail 
> legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. 
> The full disclaimer details can be found at 
> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
> 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> MailScanner, 
> and is believed to be clean.
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to