I don't get what you mean here, if there are two host in this cluster without pinning it would chose whatever it wants.
If I create a seperate cluster for each host, I cannot have VM's which coult be running on each. It's more an and/and/or issue 2016-08-25 5:17 GMT+02:00 Yaniv Dary <yd...@redhat.com>: > You can define a default cluster for this use case. > > Yaniv Dary > Technical Product Manager > Red Hat Israel Ltd. > 34 Jerusalem Road > Building A, 4th floor > Ra'anana, Israel 4350109 > > Tel : +972 (9) 7692306 > 8272306 > Email: yd...@redhat.com > IRC : ydary > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> Is it an idea to have an option, not the first boot option, to set a >> prefered host for a VM to start on ? >> >> If you remove this host that it also does not complain about a pinned >> VM as it should faillback on "any host in cluster" in that way ? >> >> It's nice for static VM's on hosts that might be started on other >> hosts when the prefered host is gone, dead or whatever. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matt >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
