On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Andrea Ghelardi <a.ghela...@iontrading.com>
wrote:

> Hello again,
>
>
>
> Just to provide an update for future reference, I’ve been unable to sort
> this problem out.
>
> However, Ovirt4 does not show this failure.
>

Handling of unmapped luns was fixed in 3.6.

The best way is to upgrade to 3.6, and then upgrade to 4, and I think this
is also
the only supported upgrade path.


>
>
> My current approach to move VMs from one installation to another is:
>
> 1)            Shutdown VM in ovirt3.
>
> 2)            Maintenance VM storage - do you mean the storage server?
>
> 3)            Clone VM storage at LUN level
>
> 4)            Import cloned storage in ovirt4
>
> 5)            Import VM in ovirt4
>
> If everything is ok:
>

You must put the storage domain to maintenance here.

Since we don't support yet removal of pv from a storage domain, you cannot
remove a lun from a storage, you must remove the entire storage domain.


> 6a)          detach + remove original VM storage in ovirt3
>
> 7a)          remove mappings for original VM storage LUN in ovirt3; this
> imply cluster instability (sanlock crash on hosts);
>
> 8a)          recover cluster; this implies shutting down host (and its VM)
> one by one
>
> 9a)          delete unmapped original LUN from storage manager
>

>
> When Sanlock freeze on host, the only solution found so far is to reboot
> it. This has to be done on all host experiencing this problem (which
> basically means: all hosts in the cluster)
>

If sanlock freezed it means that you unmapped a lun that was used by
sanlock.
This is not supported.


>
>
> Cheers
>
> AG
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrea Ghelardi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2016 16:40
> *To:* users@ovirt.org
> *Subject:* [HELP] unmapping a deleted storage domain triggers crash ovirt
>
>
>
> Hello people,
>
>
>
> something’s not right in my ovirt infrastructure.
>
> I currently have two different ovirt installation:
>
> Ovirt3: 7 hosts linked to Compellent iscsi storage running ovirt 3.5.6
>
> Ovirt4: 4 hosts linked to (same) Compellent iscsi storage running ovirt
> 4.0.4
>
>
>
> I’m currently moving my guests from ovirt3 to ovirt4.
>
> Since iscsi storage is linked to both installations, my high level
> approach is:
>
> 1)      Shutdown VM in ovirt3.
>
> 2)      Maintenance + detach + remove VM storage in ovirt3
>
> 3)      Change LUN mapping via iscsi storage manager from ovirt3 to ovirt4
>
> 4)      Import storage in ovirt4
>
> 5)      Import VM in ovirt4
>
> 6)      Run and cheers with high grade liquor. GOTO step 1 for different
> VM.
>
>
>
> Now, as soon as I perform step 3 (remove mappings from LUN), ovirt3 goes
> crazy and eventually forces me to reboot all hosts one by one.
>
> I tried different low level approaches to unmap LUN mpath’ed from hosts
> with inconsistent results.
>
> A notable error log extract is:
>
> Nov  8 15:30:52 sovana vdsm root ERROR Process failed with rc=1
> out='\nudevadm settle - timeout of 5 seconds reached, the event queue
> contains:\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8603)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8604)\n  /sys
>
> /devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8605)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8606)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8607)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8608)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8609)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block
>
> /dm-39 (8610)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8611)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8612)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8613)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8614)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8615)\n  /sys/
>
> devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8616)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8617)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8618)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8619)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8620)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/
>
> dm-39 (8621)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8622)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8623)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8624)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8625)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8626)\n  /sys/d
>
> evices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8627)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8628)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8629)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8630)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8631)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/d
>
> m-39 (8632)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8633)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8634)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8635)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8636)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8637)\n  /sys/de
>
> vices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8638)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8639)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8640)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8641)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8642)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm
>
> -39 (8643)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8644)\n
> /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39 (8645)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/dm-39
> (8646)\n  /sys/devices/virtual/block/d
>
>
>
> I really need your help to sort this out as I’m actually blocked in my
> task.
>
>
>
> Why mapping changes triggers ovirt crash on a storage which ovirt should
> not care about?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> *Andrea Ghelardi*
>
>
>
> +39 050 2203 71 *| *www.iongroup.com *| **a.ghela...@iontrading.com
> <a.ghela...@iontrading.com>*
>
> Via San Martino, 52 – 56125 Pisa - ITALY
>
>
>
> *This email and any attachments may contain information which is
> confidential and/or privileged. The information is intended exclusively for
> the addressee and the views expressed may not be official policy, but the
> personal views of the originator. If you are not the intended recipient, be
> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents is
> prohibited. If you have received this email and any file transmitted with
> it in error, please notify the sender by telephone or return email
> immediately and delete the material from your computer. Internet
> communications are not secure and ION Trading is not responsible for their
> abuse by third parties, nor for any alteration or corruption in
> transmission, nor for any damage or loss caused by any virus or other
> defect. ION Trading accepts no liability or responsibility arising out of
> or in any way connected to this email.*
>
>
>
> [image: iON_HBlu_small]
>
> Automation through innovation
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to