On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <d...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Gianluca Cecchi >> >> > >> > Two notes: >> > 1) it would be nice to pre-filter the drop down box when you have to >> > choose >> > the host where migrate the hosted engine... >> > So that if there are no hosts available you will be given a related >> > message >> > without choice at all and if there is a subset of eligible hosts inside >> > the >> > cluster, you will be proposed only to choose one of them and not all the >> > hosts inside the cluster. >> >> Makes sense, please open an RFE to track this. Thanks. > > > Been busy these latest days... > Opened now: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399609 > >> >> >> > >> > 2) If the gui option becomes the default and preferred way to deploy >> > hosts >> > in self hosted engine environments I think it should be put in clearer >> > shape >> > that if you follow the default action you would not have high >> > availability >> > for the hosted engine vm. >> > Or changing the default action to "Deploy", or showing a popup if the >> > hosted >> > engine vm has only one host configured for it but there are other hosts >> > in >> > the cluster. >> > Just my opinion. >> >> Makes sense too, but I wonder if people will then be annoyed by forgetting >> to uncheck it even after having enough HA hosts, which does have its cost >> (both actual resource use and also reservations, IIUC). Perhaps we should >> enable by default and/or remind only until you have enough HA hosts, which >> can be a configurable number (and default e.g. to 3). >> >> > > and here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399613
Thanks! -- Didi _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users