Hi Fabrice, I think you got proper explanation from Juan. I think you should indeed consider whether to use the sdk or not, depending on whether it fits your needs.
Regards, Oved On Apr 9, 2017 12:14, "Fabrice Bacchella" <fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra Machacek <omach...@redhat.com> a écrit : On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a > different method with a different name that return a associated service, so > it's not possible to have a generic like: > > def resolve(service, ...): > id = ..... > return service.service(id) > > because the generic call service is used by something that take a path > argument. But why not a service_by_id(self, id) ? > I am not fully sure I understand what you are missing, but feel free to open the bug on Python SDK in bugzilla, we will be happy to improve the SDK. I tried : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439879 I hit a wall. it seems that some of you are not willing to improve the SDK. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
