Dear Nara,

 

Thank you for your great reply.

 

1) can you please check if the disks what would be used for brick creation does 
not have labels or any partitions on them ?

 

Yes I agreed there is no labels partition available, my doubt is it possible to 
create required bricks partition from available 406.7G  Linux LVM. Following 
are the physical volume and volume group information.

 

 

[root@ovirtnode1 ~]# pvdisplay 

  --- Physical volume ---

  PV Name               /dev/sda3

  VG Name               onn

  PV Size               555.73 GiB / not usable 2.00 MiB

  Allocatable           yes 

  PE Size               4.00 MiB

  Total PE              142267

  Free PE               3823

  Allocated PE          138444

  PV UUID               v1eGGf-r1he-3XZt-JUOM-8XiT-iGkf-0xClUe

   

[root@ovirtnode1 ~]# vgdisplay 

  --- Volume group ---

  VG Name               onn

  System ID             

  Format                lvm2

  Metadata Areas        1

  Metadata Sequence No  48

  VG Access             read/write

  VG Status             resizable

  MAX LV                0

  Cur LV                12

  Open LV               7

  Max PV                0

  Cur PV                1

  Act PV                1

  VG Size               555.73 GiB

  PE Size               4.00 MiB

  Total PE              142267

  Alloc PE / Size       138444 / 540.80 GiB

  Free  PE / Size       3823 / 14.93 GiB

  VG UUID               nFfNXN-DcJt-bX1Q-UQ2U-07J5-ceT3-ULFtcy

   

 

I am thinking, to reduce the vg size and create new vg for gluster. Is it a 
good thinking.

   

 

 

Anzar Esmail Sainudeen

Group Datacenter Incharge| IT Infra Division | Thumbay Group 

P.O Box : 4184 | Ajman | United Arab Emirates. 

Mobile: 055-8633699|Tel: 06 7431333 |  Extn :1303

Email: an...@it.thumbay.com <mailto:an...@it.thumbay.com>  | Website: 
www.thumbay.com <http://www.thumbay.com/> 



 

Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you are hereby 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
and delete this material. Thumbay Group accepts no liability for errors or 
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
transmission.

 

From: Kasturi Narra [mailto:kna...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 9:48 AM
To: Anzar Esmail Sainudeen
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] hosted engine setup with Gluster fail

 

Hi,

 

   If i understand right gdeploy script is failing at [1]. There could be two 
possible reasons why that would fail.

 

1) can you please check if the disks what would be used for brick creation does 
not have lables or any partitions on them ?

 

2) can you please check if the path [1] exists. If it does not can you please 
change the path of the script in gdeploy.conf file to 
/usr/share/gdeploy/scripts/grafton-sanity-check.sh

 

[1] /usr/share/ansible/gdeploy/scripts/grafton-sanity-check.sh

 

Thanks

kasturi

 

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Anzar Esmail Sainudeen <an...@it.thumbay.com 
<mailto:an...@it.thumbay.com> > wrote:

Dear Team Ovirt,

 

I am trying to deploy hosted engine setup with Gluster. Hosted engine setup was 
failed. Total number of host is 3 server 

 

 

PLAY [gluster_servers] *********************************************************

 

TASK [Run a shell script] ******************************************************

fatal: [ovirtnode4.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode4.thumbaytechlabs.int> 
]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'result.rc != 0' 
failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (result.rc != 0): 
'dict object' has no attribute 'rc'"}

fatal: [ovirtnode3.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode3.thumbaytechlabs.int> 
]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'result.rc != 0' 
failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (result.rc != 0): 
'dict object' has no attribute 'rc'"}

fatal: [ovirtnode2.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode2.thumbaytechlabs.int> 
]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'result.rc != 0' 
failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (result.rc != 0): 
'dict object' has no attribute 'rc'"}

            to retry, use: --limit @/tmp/tmp59G7Vc/run-script.retry

 

PLAY RECAP *********************************************************************

ovirtnode2.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode2.thumbaytechlabs.int>  : ok=0  
  changed=0    unreachable=0    failed=1   

ovirtnode3.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode3.thumbaytechlabs.int>  : ok=0  
  changed=0    unreachable=0    failed=1   

ovirtnode4.thumbaytechlabs.int <http://ovirtnode4.thumbaytechlabs.int>  : ok=0  
  changed=0    unreachable=0    failed=1   

 

 

Please note my finding.

 

1.    Still I am doubt with bricks setup ares . because during the ovirt node 
setup time automatically create partition and mount all space. Please find 
below #fdisk –l output

2.     

[root@ovirtnode4 ~]# fdisk –l

 

WARNING: fdisk GPT support is currently new, and therefore in an experimental 
phase. Use at your own discretion.

 

Disk /dev/sda: 438.0 GB, 437998583808 bytes, 855465984 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk label type: gpt

 

 

#         Start          End    Size  Type            Name

1         2048       411647    200M  EFI System      EFI System Partition

2       411648      2508799      1G  Microsoft basic 

 3      2508800    855463935  406.7G  Linux LVM       

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-swap: 25.4 GB, 25367150592 bytes, 49545216 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-pool00_tmeta: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes, 2097152 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-pool00_tdata: 394.2 GB, 394159718400 bytes, 769843200 
sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-pool00-tpool: 394.2 GB, 394159718400 bytes, 769843200 
sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-ovirt--node--ng--4.1.4--0.20170728.0+1: 378.1 GB, 
378053591040 bytes, 738385920 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-pool00: 394.2 GB, 394159718400 bytes, 769843200 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-var: 16.1 GB, 16106127360 bytes, 31457280 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-root: 378.1 GB, 378053591040 bytes, 738385920 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-var--log: 8589 MB, 8589934592 bytes, 16777216 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-home: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes, 2097152 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-tmp: 2147 MB, 2147483648 bytes, 4194304 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-var--log--audit: 2147 MB, 2147483648 bytes, 4194304 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

 

Disk /dev/mapper/onn-ovirt--node--ng--4.1.5--0.20170821.0+1: 378.1 GB, 
378053591040 bytes, 738385920 sectors

Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes

Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

I/O size (minimum/optimal): 131072 bytes / 262144 bytes

 

3.    Is it possible to create a LVM portions from 406.7G  Linux LVM free space 
for the required gluster size ?

 

Please suggest…..

 

Anzar Esmail Sainudeen

Group Datacenter Incharge| IT Infra Division | Thumbay Group 

P.O Box : 4184 | Ajman | United Arab Emirates. 

Mobile: 055-8633699|Tel: 06 7431333 |  Extn :1303

Email: an...@it.thumbay.com <mailto:an...@it.thumbay.com>  | Website: 
www.thumbay.com <http://www.thumbay.com/> 



 

Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you are hereby 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify 
the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
and delete this material. Thumbay Group accepts no liability for errors or 
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
transmission.

 


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to