> On 7 Apr 2018, at 14:27, Clint Boggio <cbog...@inlinenetworks.com> wrote:
> 
> Forgive me if this is a duplicate, as I had spam filter problems previously 
> when I sent this inquiry.
> 
> Environment Rundown:
> 
> OVirt 4.2
> 6 CentOS 7.4 Compute Nodes Intel Xeon
> 1 CentOS 7.4 Dedicated Engine Node Intel Xeon 
> 1 Datacenter 
> 1 Storage Domain
> 1 Cluster
> 10Gig-E iSCSI Storage 
> 10Gig-E NFS Export Domain
> 20 VM’s of various OS’s and uses 
> 
> The current cluster is using the Nehalem architecture.
> 
> I’ve got the deploy two new VMs that the current system will not allow me to 
> configure with the Nehalem based cluster, so I’ve got to bump up the 
> architecture of the cluster to accommodate them.

why not? You are the one selecting teh VM’s CPU…why not use Nehalem too?

> 
> Before i shut down all the current VMs to upgrade the cluster, I have some 
> questions about the effect this is going to have on the environment.
> 
> 1. Will all of the current VM’s use the legacy processor architecture or will 
> I have to change them ?

running VMs will change on their power cycle. Unless you used per-VM CPU Type 
override (I suppose you did not)

> 
> 2. Can I elevate the cluster processor functionality higher than the 
> underlying hardware architecture  ?

if all your hosts support it

> 
> 3. In regards to the new cluster processor, will all of the processor 
> architectures below the one I choose be an option for the existing and future 
> VMs ?

not sure I understand the question. Normally you can use any CPU as long as it 
is supported by all hosts in the cluster. You can use per-VM override to bypass 
that, but that’s usually not a good idea

Thanks,
michal
> 
> I apologize for the long post and I hope that I haven’t left out any vital 
> information.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to