On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 3:50 PM Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> do you think it is ok to use Rocky version of Openstack to integrate its >>> services with oVirt 4.2.7 on CentOS 7? >>> I see on https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ that, if Rocky is >>> too new, between the older releases available there are, from newer to >>> older: >>> Queens >>> Pike >>> Ocata >>> Newton >> >> >> Nobody working on oVirt is testing any release of Openstack in the recent >> years.
Actually, Neutron and Glance are actively tested. >> > > Strange... I think oVirt is the natural platform to test features to have > them on RHV if considered enterprise ready. > And reading the downstream latest documentation for RHV 4.2 I see this > regarding external providers: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/html/administration_guide/chap-external_providers > > And there is explicit reference to > > 1) Glance > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/html/administration_guide/sect-adding_external_providers#Adding_an_OpenStack_Image_Service_Glance_for_Image_Management > without any particular restriction described > > 2) Neutron > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/html/administration_guide/sect-adding_external_providers#Adding_an_OpenStack_Network_Service_Neutron_for_Network_Provisioning > with the note: > " > Important > Red Hat Virtualization supports Red Hat OpenStack Platform versions 8, 9, 10, > 11, and 12 as external network providers. > " > > BTW: the release cycles are here: > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/openstack/platform > > 3) Cinder > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.2/html/administration_guide/sect-adding_external_providers#Adding_an_OpenStack_Block_Storage_Cinder_Instance_for_Storage_Management > with the only note regarding Ceph as a provider for block storage to use with > Cinder > " > Add an OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder) instance for storage management to > the Red Hat Virtualization Manager. The OpenStack Cinder volumes are > provisioned by Ceph Storage. > " > > Coming back to oVirt 4.2.7 I see all of the 3 above providers present and > referenced when I go and add external providers, so it doesn't seem to the > final user/admin as an abandoned feature > >> The Cinder/Ceph support was released as tech preview in 3.6, and no work was >> done since then, and I think this will be deprecated soon. >> > > Actually it seems yet a tech preview in latest 4.2, if the manual is correct > (see link given above for Cinder) > >> >> For 4.3 we are working on a different direction, using Cinderlib >> https://github.com/Akrog/cinderlib >> >> >> >> This is a way to use Cinder drivers without Openstack installation. >> The same library is used to provide Cinder based storage in Kubernetes. >> https://github.com/Akrog/ember-csi >> >> You can find an early draft here for this feature. Note that it is expected >> to be >> updated in the next weeks, but it can give you some idea on what we are >> working on. >> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/blob/f88f38ebb9afff656ab68a2d60c2b3ae88c21860/source/develop/release-management/features/storage/cinderlib-integration.html.md >> >> This will be tested with some version of Cinder drivers. I guess we will have >> more info about it during 4.3 development. >> > > I will go through reading them, thanks > > >>> >>> At the moment I have two separate lab environments: >>> oVirt with 4.2.7 >>> Openstack with Rocky (single host with packstack allinone) >>> >>> just trying first integration steps with these versions, it seems I'm not >>> able to communicate with glance, because I get in engine.log >>> 2018-11-10 17:32:58,386+01 ERROR >>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.storage.AbstractOpenStackStorageProviderProxy] >>> (default task-51) [e2fccee7-1bb2-400f-b8d3-b87b679117d1] Not Found >>> (OpenStack response error code: 404) >> >> >> I think Glance support should work. Elad, which version of Glance was >> tested for 4.2? > > > Based on the restrictions described for Neutron Provider above, I right > deployed, always on CentOS 7.5 and using packstack allinone method, the > oldest release I found a repo for at > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/ . > That is Ocata (aka the base for OSP 11) and at least the glance connection > works now out of the box, using the same parameters that dind't work with > Rocky. > > 2018-11-11 17:52:46,320+01 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] > (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Running > command: SyncNetworkProviderCommand internal: true. > 2018-11-11 17:52:46,432+01 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.sso.utils.AuthenticationUtils] (default task-61) [] > User admin@internal successfully logged in with scopes: ovirt-app-api > ovirt-ext=token-info:authz-search ovirt-ext=token-info:public-authz-search > ovirt-ext=token-info:validate ovirt-ext=token:password-access > 2018-11-11 17:52:46,576+01 INFO > [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.provider.network.SyncNetworkProviderCommand] > (EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-14) [4e83174] Lock freed to > object > 'EngineLock:{exclusiveLocks='[0799c428-dc87-4ee4-900c-1ad3927dab6c=PROVIDER]', > sharedLocks=''}' > > And I'm able to see the pre-created cirros glance image provided by the > packstack installation in the added storage domain in oVirt: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1msHuY-3r9bgXV92PaU36dAa9Z37BXdDV/view?usp=sharing > > Donna if a problem in configuration with packstack passing from Ocata to > Rocky or any feature itself that changed with Rocky. > I have both (Rocky server and Ocata server) and can compare them if it can be > of any help to have Rocky working with oVirt 4.2.7 Would you share your provider credentials? OpenStack dropped support for keystone v2, and in ovirt-4.2.7 we've introduced support for keystone v3. It smells related to your issue. > >> >> Regarding which Openstack version can work best with oVirt, maybe >> Openstack guys I added can give a better answer. >> >> Nir > > > Thanks Nir. > It would be of help to know cross relations and best combinations. > In the mean time I'm going ahead with Ocata and see Neutron and Cinder > providers behaviour. > > Gianluca > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/TVH52LPLJT2BGTKJ2ZQH5URCQCWX2PCM/ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/A44L6D4YVOPF2JO7BGGCODNAN2IF2Q35/
