On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 08:48, Roy Golan <rgo...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 09:49, Nathanaël Blanchet <blanc...@abes.fr> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 19/11/2019 à 19:23, Nathanaël Blanchet a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Le 19/11/2019 à 13:43, Roy Golan a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 14:34, Nathanaël Blanchet <blanc...@abes.fr>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 19/11/2019 à 08:55, Roy Golan a écrit :
>>>
>>> oc get -o json clusterversion
>>>
>>> This is the output of the previous failed deployment, I'll give a try to
>>> a newer one when I'll have a minute to test
>>>
>> Without changing nothing with template,  I gave a new try and... nothing
>> works anymore now, none of provided IPs can be pingued : dial tcp
>> 10.34.212.51:6443: connect: no route to host", so none of masters can be
>> provisonned by bootstrap.
>>
>> I tried with the latest rhcos and latest ovirt 4.3.7, it is the same.
>> Obviously something changed since my first attempt 12 days ago... is your
>> docker image for openshift-installer up to date?
>>
>> Are you still able to your side to deploy a valid cluster ?
>>
>> I investigated looking at bootstrap logs (attached) and it seems that
>> every containers die immediately after been started.
>>
>> Nov 20 07:02:33 localhost podman[2024]: 2019-11-20 07:02:33.60107571
>> +0000 UTC m=+0.794838407 container init
>> 446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603 (image=
>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release:4.3, name=eager_cannon)
>> Nov 20 07:02:33 localhost podman[2024]: 2019-11-20 07:02:33.623197173
>> +0000 UTC m=+0.816959853 container start
>> 446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603 (image=
>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release:4.3, name=eager_cannon)
>> Nov 20 07:02:33 localhost podman[2024]: 2019-11-20 07:02:33.623814258
>> +0000 UTC m=+0.817576965 container attach
>> 446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603 (image=
>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release:4.3, name=eager_cannon)
>> Nov 20 07:02:34 localhost systemd[1]:
>> libpod-446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603.scope:
>> Consumed 814ms CPU time
>> Nov 20 07:02:34 localhost podman[2024]: 2019-11-20 07:02:34.100569998
>> +0000 UTC m=+1.294332779 container died
>> 446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603 (image=
>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release:4.3, name=eager_cannon)
>> Nov 20 07:02:35 localhost podman[2024]: 2019-11-20 07:02:35.138523102
>> +0000 UTC m=+2.332285844 container remove
>> 446dc9b7a04ff3ff4bbcfa6750e3946c084741b39707eb088c9d7ae648e35603 (image=
>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release:4.3, name=eager_cannon)
>>
>> and this:
>>
>> Nov 20 07:04:16 localhost hyperkube[1909]: E1120 07:04:16.489527    1909
>> remote_runtime.go:200] CreateContainer in sandbox
>> "58f2062aa7b6a5b2bdd6b9cf7b41a9f94ca2b30ad5a20e4fa4dec8a9b82f05e5" from
>> runtime service failed: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = container create
>> failed: container_linux.go:345: starting container process caused "exec:
>> \"runtimecfg\": executable file not found in $PATH"
>> Nov 20 07:04:16 localhost hyperkube[1909]: E1120 07:04:16.489714    1909
>> kuberuntime_manager.go:783] init container start failed:
>> CreateContainerError: container create failed: container_linux.go:345:
>> starting container process caused "exec: \"runtimecfg\": executable file
>> not found in $PATH"
>>
>> What do you think about this?
>>
>
> I'm seeing the same now, checking...
>
>
Because of the move upstream to release OKD the release-image that comes
with the installer I gave you are no longer valid.

I need to prepare an installer version with the preview of OKD, you can
find the details here
https://mobile.twitter.com/smarterclayton/status/1196477646885965824



(do I need to use the terraform-workers tag instead of latest?)
>>>
>>> docker pull quay.io/rgolangh/openshift-installer:terraform-workers
>>>
>>>
>>> [root@openshift-installer
>>> openshift-origin-client-tools-v3.11.0-0cbc58b-linux-64bit]# ./oc get -o
>>> json clusterversion
>>> {
>>>     "apiVersion": "v1",
>>>     "items": [
>>>         {
>>>             "apiVersion": "config.openshift.io/v1",
>>>             "kind": "ClusterVersion",
>>>             "metadata": {
>>>                 "creationTimestamp": "2019-11-07T12:23:06Z",
>>>                 "generation": 1,
>>>                 "name": "version",
>>>                 "namespace": "",
>>>                 "resourceVersion": "3770202",
>>>                 "selfLink": "/apis/
>>> config.openshift.io/v1/clusterversions/version",
>>>                 "uid": "77600bba-6e71-4b35-a60b-d8ee6e0f545c"
>>>             },
>>>             "spec": {
>>>                 "channel": "stable-4.3",
>>>                 "clusterID": "6f87b719-e563-4c0b-ab5a-1144172bc983",
>>>                 "upstream":
>>> "https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph";
>>> <https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph>
>>>             },
>>>             "status": {
>>>                 "availableUpdates": null,
>>>                 "conditions": [
>>>                     {
>>>                         "lastTransitionTime": "2019-11-07T12:23:12Z",
>>>                         "status": "False",
>>>                         "type": "Available"
>>>                     },
>>>                     {script
>>>                         "lastTransitionTime": "2019-11-07T12:56:15Z",
>>>                         "message": "Cluster operator image-registry is
>>> still updating",
>>>                         "reason": "ClusterOperatorNotAvailable",
>>>                         "status": "True",
>>>                         "type": "Failing"
>>>                     },
>>>                     {
>>>                         "lastTransitionTime": "2019-11-07T12:23:12Z",
>>>                         "message": "Unable to apply
>>> 4.3.0-0.okd-2019-10-29-180250: the cluster operator image-registry has not
>>> yet successfully rolled out",
>>>                         "reason": "ClusterOperatorNotAvailable",
>>>                         "status": "True",
>>>                         "type": "Progressing"
>>>                     },
>>>                     {
>>>                         "lastTransitionTime": "2019-11-07T12:23:12Z",
>>>                         "message": "Unable to retrieve available
>>> updates: currently installed version 4.3.0-0.okd-2019-10-29-180250 not
>>> found in the \"stable-4.3\" channel",
>>>                         "reason": "RemoteFailed",
>>>                         "status": "False",
>>>                         "type": "RetrievedUpdates"
>>>                     }
>>>                 ],
>>>                 "desired": {
>>>                     "force": false,
>>>                     "image": "
>>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release@sha256:68286e07f7d68ebc8a067389aabf38dee9f9b810c5520d6ee4593c38eb48ddc9
>>> ",
>>>                     "version": "4.3.0-0.okd-2019-10-29-180250"
>>>
>>
>> Indeed this version is not the latest and is missing the aforementioned
>> fix for the registry.
>>
>>                 },
>>>                 "history": [
>>>                     {
>>>                         "completionTime": null,
>>>                         "image": "
>>> registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/origin/release@sha256:68286e07f7d68ebc8a067389aabf38dee9f9b810c5520d6ee4593c38eb48ddc9
>>> ",
>>>                         "startedTime": "2019-11-07T12:23:12Z",
>>>                         "state": "Partial",
>>>                         "verified": false,
>>>                         "version": "4.3.0-0.okd-2019-10-29-180250"
>>>                     }
>>>                 ],
>>>                 "observedGeneration": 1,
>>>                 "versionHash": "-3onP9QpPTg="
>>>             }
>>>         }
>>>     ],
>>>     "kind": "List",
>>>     "metadata": {
>>>         "resourceVersion": "",
>>>         "selfLink": ""
>>>     }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you answer to these few questions please?
>>>
>>>    - The latest stable OKD version is 4.2.4. Is it possible to chose
>>>    the version of okd when deploying (seems to use 4.3) or does the 
>>> installer
>>>    always download the latest OKD?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>    - Can we use FCOS instead of RHCOS?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>    - About the pull secret, do we absolutely need a redhat login to get
>>>    this file to deploy an upstream OKD cluster and not downstream openshift?
>>>
>>>
>>> To answer the 3 of those, this specific build is not really OKD, and
>> will use 4.3 and Red Hat artifact and must use RHCOs, hence the pull secret
>> thing.
>> I frankly don't know when OKD 4.3 is going to be released, I guess it
>> will be on top FCOS.
>> I'll update the list once we have the oVirt installer for OKD ready for
>> testing (on FCOS)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>> Nathanaël Blanchet
>>>
>>> Supervision réseau
>>> Pôle Infrastrutures Informatiques
>>> 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
>>> 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5   
>>> Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
>>> Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14blanc...@abes.fr
>>>
>>> --
>> Nathanaël Blanchet
>>
>> Supervision réseau
>> Pôle Infrastrutures Informatiques
>> 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
>> 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5    
>> Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
>> Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14blanc...@abes.fr
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
>> oVirt Code of Conduct: 
>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/MLO4NW7NWR2TXKOJ4MJLW4N3DFU2PJ7V/
>>
>> --
>> Nathanaël Blanchet
>>
>> Supervision réseau
>> Pôle Infrastrutures Informatiques
>> 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
>> 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5    
>> Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55
>> Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14blanc...@abes.fr
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/GVCZ5VYNF6EVCKRSMUK2QLN4F56RJ4W3/

Reply via email to