On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net> wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Ales Musil <amu...@redhat.com> said:
> > That is generally a bad idea, oVirt has its own network persistence, it
> > would be reverted
> > on reboot and the engine would complain that those networks are out of
> > sync.
>
> Part of the email had been trimmed - this was a temporary thing for
> physically moving this cluster to a new location, where the VLANs are
> all bridged across a couple of links that don't support jumbo frames.  I
> didn't want to make a permanent change, and in my testing, lowering the
> MTU while iSCSI connections were active broke them.
>
> So I rolled through the hosts, putting them in maintenance, changing the
> MTU manually, and reactivating them, and that did work.  The engine did
> note that the networks were out of sync, but did not force them back
> (which was my main concern).
>
> I definitely wouldn't do this for any normal thing, but it did work for
> my temporary setup during the move.  I was able to move my running VMs
> and their storage to a new home, 5 miles away, without shutting any of
> them down.

Cool!

This can be good content for ovirt blog:
https://blogs.ovirt.org/
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/RV4E24JZFUKQ5C6APNOWTUR4IAQLBMJD/

Reply via email to