No worries from my end. Having worked with both technologies, I can attest to the fact that you may want to take a serious look at PDFBox.
Duane Nickull *********************************** Technoracle Advanced Systems Inc. Consulting and Contracting; Proven Results! i. Neo4J, PDF, Java, LiveCycle ES, Flex, AIR, CQ5 & Mobile b. http://technoracle.blogspot.com t. @duanechaos Whis.pr http://whis.pr On 2013-01-31 7:52 AM, "Florian Fleischer" <[email protected]> wrote: >Sorry... I didn't mean it... I was mixing up the mail addresses... > > > > >________________________________ > Von: Andreas Lehmkühler <[email protected]> >An: [email protected] >Gesendet: 14:12 Donnerstag, 31.Januar 2013 >Betreff: Re: newest Itext version via SVN > >Hi, > >Am 31.01.13 13:30, schrieb Florian Fleischer: >> Hi, >> >> I am using the address svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/itext/code/ and >> realized that this is not the newest as I compared the code with >> the itextLib in my maven repository .... could you give >> me the newest SVN address... >I'm afraid you've asked the wrong people. This mailing list belongs to >the Apache PDFBox community. PDFBox isn't related to iText, it is some >sort of a competitor using a more friendly license [2]. See [1] for >further details if you are interested to use an alternative to iText. >Feel free to come back if you have some more questions. We'll be happy >to answer them. > >> Thanks >> >> Florian > >If you are still looking for iText have a look at [3] and be aware that >they changed the license recently. > >BR >Andreas Lehmkühler > >[1] http://pdfbox.apache.org >[2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >[3] http://www.itextpdf.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
