Last I knew, some of the gradient and masking functions were incomplete, but most other areas worked very well. On Aug 29, 2013 12:18 PM, "Maruan Sahyoun" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > pdf to image conversion is one of the top features of PDFBox and > consistently improved. There will be some major enhancements in PDFBox 2.0 > when rendering PDFs with embedded fonts. Unfortunately there is currently > no feature matrix documenting the PDF standard coverage of PDFBox (but we > are working on it). > > BR > > Maruan Sahyoun > > > Am 29.08.2013 um 18:06 schrieb Axel Rose <[email protected]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I was surprised to see the rendering output of pdfbox via > convertToImage(). > > This produces quite good quality in my tests. > > > > Is there a known limit for supported formats, color spaces, transparency > or > > other constructs? > > > > Can anybody say if pdfbox will develop to a quality replacement for > > GhostScript as a RIP? > > > > At the moment using pdfbox 1.8.2 there are a few "unsupported/disabled > operation: XX" > > messages (e.g. BX, EX, EMC, BDC). > > > > > > Thanks and best regards > > > > Axel. > > > >
