Hi,

No, the font changes haven't been integrated in the 1.8.* version (and it won't happen) and the 2.0 version hasn't been released yet (although it is better than ever).

Sorry, I can't tell (i.e. don't know) when the 2.0 version will be released. See also the controversial discussion on the dev mailing list.

Tilman

Am 21.10.2014 um 19:17 schrieb Tres Finocchiaro:
@Tilman,

About 8 months has gone by since your very generous response about the
features in PDFBOX 2.0, specifically those in regards to font rendering.

Are embedded fonts still waiting on the 2.0 release, or have there been
changes in 1.8.7 which have accelerated some of these features to the 1.8
branch?

I'm sorry if this question is answered elsewhere.  We are looking to
migrate an open source product from pdf-renderer, and font support is our
biggest hurdle currently. :)

- [email protected]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>
wrote:

Most of the time, the 2.0 version is very stable. There's currently a lot
going on but I hope that all the regressions will be solved in a few days.

Tilman

Am 26.02.2014 06:55, schrieb Tres Finocchiaro:

  @Tilman,
Thank you for the record-breaking fast response!

qz-print can certainly migrate to JDK6 if needed.

The project only use the silent print feature (no bouncycastle, no
advanced
logging).  Would I be a good usecase for 2.0.0 or should I hold off for a
milestone release?

- [email protected]


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]
wrote:
  Yes this is a known problem. PDFBOX 2.0 has a much improved font
rendering. But that one needs JDK 6 :-(
Tilman

Am 26.02.2014 06:41, schrieb Tres Finocchiaro:

   Hi, I'm the author of qz-print and for our next release, we're
switching

from pdf-renderer to pdf-box.

Things are working pretty well in terms of integration, however I've
noticed that fonts seem to render a bit off on some platforms.

After investigating this, I decided to make the output a bit more
verbose
and go this:

INFO: Couldn't load VYQQAT+Arial, using font Arial instead

  INFO: Couldn't load QTPJOZ+TimesNewRoman, using font Times New Roman
instead

    From my research the ABCDEF+Font names are embedded fonts, which
from my
little experience reading the PDFBOX source code there is some form of
support for embedded fonts.

Reactively, I've created some improved font mapping for Ubuntu (
http://jsfiddle.net/LpBLw/) but I have to ask, am I doing something
wrong
that is preventing embedded fonts from loading?

FYI - I compile my program using JDK5.

Here's the source tree I'm working from:
https://github.com/qzindustries/qz-print/tree/master/pdfbox_1.8.4_qz

Any help is greatly appreciated and thank you for the excellent work!

-Tres


- [email protected]




Reply via email to