Am 15.06.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Esteban R:
Warning: don't use the following link to download de pdf:
<http://file-upload.com/d/6FgO> (seems to be a malicious page, I tried to
remove the link while writing the e-mail, but that part was kept anyways)
done
.
Use this one instead:
http://wikisend.com/download/185248/out.pdf
Thanks... disregard my theory about PDFBOX-1958. But I am not able to
reproduce the effect with jdk8. With jdk9 there is an effect but it
looks better for me (my screen is on 125%).
The PDFToImage results are identical.
What jdk are you using? What OS, and do you have a screen that is not
set at 100% ?
Tilman
Esteban
________________________________
De: Esteban R <[email protected]>
Enviado: jueves, 15 de junio de 2017 04:09 p.m.
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: Change in image quality between versions 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 (also
applies to 2.0.6)
These links should work for at least a week:
Screenshots:
https://img4.file-upload.com/i/00298/5ep2gagcmcna.jpg
[https://img4.file-upload.com/i/00298/5ep2gagcmcna.jpg]
(2.0.4)
https://img5.file-upload.com/i/00298/8llrhev3r8oz.jpg
[https://img5.file-upload.com/i/00298/8llrhev3r8oz.jpg]
(2.0.5)
PDF:
<http://file-upload.com/d/6FgO>http://wikisend.com/download/185248/out.pdf (need to click
the "Download" button)
________________________________
De: Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>
Enviado: jueves, 15 de junio de 2017 03:35 p.m.
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: Change in image quality between versions 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 (also
applies to 2.0.6)
Am 15.06.2017 um 02:37 schrieb Esteban R:
Hello.
I have noticed with PDFDebugger that the same pdf is rendered
differently by pdfbox-2.0.4 and by pdfbox-2.0.5 (pdfbox-2.0.6 produces
the same output than pdfbox-2.0.5): the newer versions generate a more
pixelated image.
Please find attached a sample pdf and two screenshots of PDFDebugger
in version 2.0.4 and in version 2.0.5 (also applies for version 2.0.6).
Please upload a PDF to a sharehoster, attachments don't get through. It
*might* be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958
[PDFBOX-1958] image mask outline with shading pattern is
...<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958>
issues.apache.org
This is also somewhat of a regression: two weeks ago, the attached file had the
image rendered in b/w, now it is invisible. I was able to get the image in
another ...
[PDFBOX-1958] image mask outline with shading pattern is
...<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958>
[PDFBOX-1958] image mask outline with shading pattern is
...<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958>
issues.apache.org
This is also somewhat of a regression: two weeks ago, the attached file had the
image rendered in b/w, now it is invisible. I was able to get the image in
another ...
issues.apache.org
This is also somewhat of a regression: two weeks ago, the attached file had the
image rendered in b/w, now it is invisible. I was able to get the image in
another ...
see the last two comments I made there. Without the change some files
would not be rendered at all.
The old approach is better for our pourposes. Is there a way to revert
to the old rendering?
By using 2.0.4, obviously. Alternatively build from source code a 2.0.6
version, and try to revert the commit mentioned in the issue above. It
is possible because the change did not touch very much.
But I'd still be interested in seeing your PDF.
Tilman
