I'm inclined to think the library is wrong in this regard, but I have an easy 
workaround.

private static void setWidgetBorderWeight(PDBorderStyleDictionary borderStyle, 
String string) {
        int wt;
        try {
                wt = Integer.parseInt(string);
        } catch (NumberFormatException exc) {
                wt = 1;
        }
        //borderStyle.setWidth(wt);
        COSDictionary dict = borderStyle.getCOSObject();
        dict.setInt("W", wt);
}

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Grosso [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 4:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: QUADDING constants

I can call PDBorderStyleDictionary.setWidth with 0, 1, or 2, for now, but it 
looks to me like setWidth() sets the COSObject to a float, e.g., 0.0, 1.0, 
etc., which Acrobat XI and Reader DC ignore. It should be set to an integer.

See http://aapro.net/PDF/BorderWeightTestAcrobat.pdf vs 
aapro.net/PDF/BorderWeightTest.pdf. 

The BorderWeightTestAcrobat.pdf was created by opening BorderWeightTest.pdf in 
Acrobat, setting the borders, and saving.

It's a little awkward, since setWidth should really take an int argument, not a 
float to begin with. The PDF spec, to my reading, is looking for an integer 
number of points. So truly fixing it would break any applications trying to 
pass in a float. OTOH, I don't see how any such applications could be working, 
even though they'd compile. I suppose non-Adobe PDF renderers might work with 
float data.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 12:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: QUADDING constants

Am 06.09.2017 um 17:11 schrieb Gary Grosso:
> Thanks Tilman, I thought they were public but not visible, which was 
> disturbing my fragile sense of competency.

I first thought you were using Netbeans (which requires to press CTRL SPACE 
twice to see the statics sometimes) but then I saw the missing public. I'll 
create an issue later tonight or tomorrow (unless you do) to put it back in. I 
don't see a reason why this was removed.

Tilman


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 11:03 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: QUADDING constants
>
> Am 06.09.2017 um 16:54 schrieb Gary Grosso:
>> Sigh. This must be something about Java I need to understand better. I get 
>> "The field PDVariableText.QUADDING_LEFT is not visible".
> You're right... these are not public. That explains why google found it only 
> for an older version.
>
> Tilman
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 2:13 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: QUADDING constants
>>
>> Am 06.09.2017 um 02:42 schrieb Gary Grosso:
>>> PDVariableText.setQ (and various other methods) suggest seeing the 
>>> "QUADDING constants".
>>>
>>> Can someone please post a link? Or tell me what class to look at? I've 
>>> searched, googled, etc., for close to a half hour. I suspect this is 
>>> something that everyone "just knows" but I have to admit ignorance.
>> It's also mentioned in the PDF 32000 specification:
>>
>> A code specifying the form of quadding (justification) that shall be used in 
>> displaying the annotation's text:
>> 0 Left-justified
>> 1 Centered
>> 2 Right-justified
>> Default value: 0 (left-justified).
>>
>> And then I enter "PDVariableText quadding" (without quotes) in google I find 
>> the constants that Andreas mentioned, although for an older version. If you 
>> don't get these, check if some plugin manipulated your browser's search 
>> results.
>>
>> Tilman
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to