2019-11-21 10:15:32 UTC - geal: opened an issue for this: <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/5712> I’ll test patching it now ---- 2019-11-21 11:40:40 UTC - Fernando: how can I build the pulsar repo in docker? I’m having issues by having a different Java JDK version ---- 2019-11-21 13:38:46 UTC - Keith: @Keith has joined the channel ---- 2019-11-21 14:01:43 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: <!here> Is there javadocs for the pulsar common module? Can't find it in <https://pulsar.apache.org/api/> ---- 2019-11-21 14:02:31 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: I'm looking for javadocs for the `FunctionConfig` class ---- 2019-11-21 14:11:19 UTC - Keith: Hi I'm starting up a docker container for apachepulsar/pulsar-standalone:2.4.1 for testing purposes only, but it is taking a large amount of memory over 1GB real memory. What is the easiest way to spin up a minimal configuration? ---- 2019-11-21 14:12:40 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: You can run Pulsar in local mode: by using the scripts in the `bin` folder: `bin/pulsar standalone` . See <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/standalone/#start-pulsar-standalone> ---- 2019-11-21 14:24:11 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: <!here> Is it possible to create topics with a specific schema via the pulsar admin java api? ---- 2019-11-21 14:24:21 UTC - Keith: So I have spun up the image using `/pulsar/bin/pulsar standalone` and it comes up at 1GB memory. Is this the smallest I can have the docker image or are there a recommended minimal set of config parameters for testing development? ---- 2019-11-21 14:24:58 UTC - Chris Miller: Please stop notifying the 1200+ people in this channel clap : Holger Hoffstätte, xiaolong.ran ---- 2019-11-21 14:25:03 UTC - tuteng: <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a6a91990907cf8d2458ff8b7e1e916a9bfb17ec0cd216d57c66ab96c@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E>
---------------------------- :white_check_mark: Python <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/python/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> :white_check_mark: CPP <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/cpp/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> :white_check_mark: pulsar-admin <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/admin/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> :white_check_mark: pulsar-broker <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/pulsar-broker/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> :white_check_mark: pulsar-functions <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/pulsar-functions/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> :white_check_mark: pulsar-client <http://pulsar.apache.org/api/client/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/> ---------------------------- ---- 2019-11-21 14:25:51 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: Don't know, probably the smallest that is required ---- 2019-11-21 14:26:24 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: :open_mouth: I'm so sorry, didn't even realise what I was doing ---- 2019-11-21 14:52:34 UTC - geal: this page indicates that a tenant can have its own authorization scheme: <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/concepts-multi-tenancy/> How does it work? Can a tenant have a custom authorization provider, or is it just that each tenant can have its own set of admin roles? ---- 2019-11-21 14:53:51 UTC - Keith: Precisely ... I am looking for some advice on what levers to pull and how far. WHAT ARE THE VALUES ---- 2019-11-21 17:52:50 UTC - Sijie Guo: You can tune the JVM settings in conf/pulsar_env.sh ---- 2019-11-21 17:54:23 UTC - Sijie Guo: No the authorization and authentication plugins are configured at a per-cluster basis. ---- 2019-11-21 17:55:13 UTC - Sijie Guo: mvn clean install -Pdocker -DskipTests ---- 2019-11-21 19:12:51 UTC - leonidv: I suppose that you can, guide is here: <https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/schema-manage/#schema-manual-management> ---- 2019-11-21 19:23:51 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: Do I have to deploy a schema before using it for pulsar functions or topics with custom POJOs as payload? ---- 2019-11-21 22:48:28 UTC - Britt Bolen: Should a client.closeAsync() in java cause unsent batches to send? I’m seeing lost messages if i use batched sends and then close the pulsar client quickly after all the send callbacks complete. If I explicitly close the producers before the client I don’t see any missing messages. ---- 2019-11-22 03:58:47 UTC - leonidv: You have not. The schema storage is part of Apache Pulsar, just try this yourself.<https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/en/schema-get-started/> ---- 2019-11-22 04:46:22 UTC - leonidv: Hi all! Is it possible that Pulsar Function can publish the result of the processing of record to several output topics at the same time? For example, the topic `input` contains `Person {name : "A", age: 10}`. Can I write to the topic `output-names` the record `Person {name : "A"}` and write to the topic `output-ages` the record `Person {age: 10}` ? ---- 2019-11-22 04:55:29 UTC - Jasper Li: I guess it should be done by: ```def function(...): ... context.publish("output-names", Person {name : "A"}) context.publish("output-ages", Person {age: 10})``` but I am not sure I am correct or not. For reference, you may check out `Content-based routing example` in <https://www.bookstack.cn/read/pulsar-v2.4/acd792f05b76f5f5.md>. ---- 2019-11-22 08:19:31 UTC - Pedro Cardoso: I have but it seemingly only works for JSON-based schemas when POJOs are json-serializable by jackson. If I try for example Avro or Protobuf it will not work. ---- 2019-11-22 08:35:56 UTC - leonidv: In cases from the documentation, it looks like only one an output topic from a function and a separated log topic. I've read PIP (<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-15:-Pulsar-Functions>) but also can't found the answer in this. ----
