Hi Brian, > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Are you running the same test scenario as described in 3.3 of that > > document? I.e. Simulating "60 AMQP clients talking to the > AMQP broker > > with 10 shared queues". (That is not what you get for perftest with > > 'default settings' which is why I ask what may be a stupid > question). > > I'm not. I wanted to start by trying to get a baseline stat > for one queue (that is, how fast can Qpid serve one > session?). The actual scenario I'm working with is closer to: > > ./perftest --mode topic --count 100000 --npubs 4 --size 100 > --pub-confirm no -s > > I had installed on a Windows box, but I'm comparing it to a > Linux box now, and the Linux box is trouncing it. From the > comments here, it sounds like I'll need to go Linux if I ever > hope to get any performance out of it.
Just a note... I worked on the Windows port and I can tell you we never tuned the performance, analyzed bottlenecks, etc. I don't know if a small amount of such analysis and tuning could get much improved performance, but it's a possibility you may want to consider in the grand scheme of things. > I had hoped there was > something simple I wasn't doing or some build option I could > change, but it sounds like the OS is a major factor. > > On the above test: > > Windows 2003 (8-core) > Pubs: 5671 msg/sec > Subs: 8672 msg/sec > Total: 17262 msg/sec > Throughput: 1.64 MiB/s > > Debian Linux (1-core?) > Pubs: 5892 msg/sec > Subs: 11343 msg/sec > Total: 22687 msg/sec > Throughput: 2.16 MiB/s Oh my - that is bad. I'm not a Windows bigot but I'd think that it should be closer than that. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications http://www.riverace.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
