On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 11:04 AM, Charith Wickramarachchi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was using Qpidc 0.6 broker with qpid 0.6 Java client. But i'm facing a
>> Memory leak in the long run. Issue is in the close() in the
>> org.apache.qpid.transport.Session class.
>>
>>> From the Source its look like qpid 0.8 java client code is much better
>>> than
>>>
>> the qpid 0.6 client code and these issues are addressed.So i'm thinking of
>> moving to qpid 0.8 client.
>>
>> My question is can i use qpid 0.8 java client with qpidc 0.6 broker ? Are
>> they compatible ?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
Thanks Gordon. I was able to move to the qpid. 0.8. Even though i have
enabled persistence in the qpid c++ broker. I had to attach additional
parameters in the queue definition to enable the persistence.
ex : "QueueName; {create: always, node: {durable: true}}"
I'm mentioning this since it will be helpful to other who will face the same
problem.
thanks,
Charith
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project: http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
>
>
--
Charith Dhanushka Wickramarachchi
http://charithwiki.blogspot.com/
