On Sep 22, 2011 7:37 PM, "Fraser Adams" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> What's the case for saying that using std::string as a container for
binary data is a good idea? Just because it's common doesn't make
necessarily make it a great thing. To me it seems inappropriate and there
are other containers that seem more valid for binary data. Perhaps it's just
me, but I certainly see a string as a sequence of characters - in other
words textual data.

Not sure why is that. I guess it's because it makes things easy by allowing
fast pass-by-value, which means you don't have to worry about memory
ownership like when passing around char pointers. From that perspective you
could see std::string as something like a shared array of bytes. (Assuming
the implementation of std::string uses copy-on-write semantics.)

Reply via email to