That seems to have fixed it!

Thanks!
Wes

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wed 4/24/2013 2:00 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible Python API Performance Problem
 
Wes,

It seems that you are accumulating senders in the service process. You 
create one per response but never close them.  Try adding
"sender.close()" after the send in the service program.

-Ted


On 04/24/2013 11:50 AM, Wes Parish wrote:
> I have been seeing some strange behavior with the 0.20 C++ broker (I see the 
> same behavior in the 0.14 broker as well) when sending / receiving messages 
> with the Python API.  It seems that the response time increases for each 
> consecutive message.
>
> The client sends a message with a reply-to field and waits for a response.
> The service receives all messages and immediately replies to the reply-to 
> address.
>
> I have attached my test code to the bottom of this email.  Please let me know 
> if I am not cleaning something up properly or misusing a class.
>
> Here is the result of running the client code 10 times in a row without 
> cycling the service.
>
> Sent 100 messages in 5.32662820816 seconds at 18.7736023789 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 6.41928505898 seconds at 15.578058784 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 6.92662286758 seconds at 14.4370499032 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 7.94101595879 seconds at 12.5928471267 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 8.71410989761 seconds at 11.475641365 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 9.71762895584 seconds at 10.290576071 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 10.6746881008 seconds at 9.36795520914 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 11.2466139793 seconds at 8.89156506871 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 12.0393908024 seconds at 8.30606810938 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 12.906840086 seconds at 7.74782978125 messages / second
>
> Cycled the service.
>
> And another result of running the same client code 10 more times.
>
> Sent 100 messages in 5.36381697655 seconds at 18.643440005 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 6.09826803207 seconds at 16.3980985214 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 7.14273500443 seconds at 14.0002393954 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 8.16057085991 seconds at 12.2540446884 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 8.86364603043 seconds at 11.2820389777 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 9.45885896683 seconds at 10.5720996952 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 10.3048520088 seconds at 9.70416653382 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 11.9087610245 seconds at 8.39717916872 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 12.8042399883 seconds at 7.80991297345 messages / second
> Sent 100 messages in 12.7495720387 seconds at 7.84340052332 messages / second
>
>
> Thanks,
> Wes
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to