On Sex, 2013-06-07 at 16:18 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote: > On 07/06/13 15:11, Bruno Matos wrote: > > Hi Fraser, > > > > Thank you. > > I'm glad that it's already there, sorry to ask, but I searched in the > > web site and didn't find anything about it there. > > > > Regards, > > Bruno Matos > As I say, it's now in the trunk. It hasn't made it into the up-coming > qpid 0.22 release, but it should make it into 0.24. For info the 0.22 > release will feature some nifty changes to the web site - though I guess > it still won't mention the GUI 'cause it's not in 0.22. > > To date there aren't massive differences to the last version attached to > the original Jira post, mainly tweaks and some tidying up. Since I > actually committed it I've spent most of my available time doing the > Java Broker QMF stuff. TBH I think that was a wise move because getting > a grip on management is one of the "strategic" things that needs to be > properly sorted and as much by accident as design (I started out doing > the Java Broker QMF plugin as a bit of fun to see if I could :-)) it > ended up stirring things up a little and giving some decent food for > thought. > > There's an awful lot of changes afoot wrt. management, Rob Godfrey has > been beavering away at OASIS on the AMQP 1.0 Management Specification - > you may have seen his post a few weeks ago? Trying to evolve towards > that without breaking all the existing QMF tooling is going to be an > *interesting* journey :-) I'm still musing over it (AKA procrastinating > big time). > > Another thing that's likely to start happening more is increasing > "componentisation". So that's already happened with Proton, but I think > it's likely to happen with other aspects (including/especially) management. > > In many ways the Java Broker is way ahead of the curve there because of > the plug-in architecture (It turned out to be surprisingly easy to write > the QMF plugin despite having no experience of the Java Broker and a > slightly moving target as the plugin API evolved). Unfortunately the QMF > stuff in the C++ broker is somewhat more coupled in with the core broker > code base. I think there's a general view that it'd be good to decouple > and move it to a plug-in, but I'm not aware of any concrete plans on > that front yet. IMHO that's a pretty essential prerequisite for moving > towards AMQP 1.0 Management as plugins/shims are our friends when it > comes to "dual-stacking" QMF and AMQP 1.0 Management. Unfortunately my > C++ is currently rusty/lousy so I doubt I can help there. > > Hopefully you are still finding the UI useful? Unfortunately it got me a > bit hooked on HTML5 and I've recently got a bit sidetracked trying to > push the boundaries a bit, one of my side-projects is an HTML5 VNC > client that I'm messing with as a forerunner to having a go at doing an > HTML5 X11 Server - unfortunately there aren't enough hours in the day to > do everything I'd like :-)
Yes, I'm still using it. I didn't try it on 0.22 though, but soon I will. We should make a movement to increase the number of hours in a day, if I can suggest a number, I would say at least 48... :) Regards. -- Bruno Matos --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
