Re my ones:
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/README-Java-Broker.txt
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/authentication/account.properties
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/index.html
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie6.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie7.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie8.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie9.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/iscroll.js
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/jquery.js
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/index.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/qmf.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/ui/config.js
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/ui/qmf.html
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/src/restapi/java/org/apache/qpid/restapi/servlet/TODO
Certainly for
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie6.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie7.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie8.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet-ie9.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/itablet.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/iscroll.js
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/scripts/jquery.js
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/index.css
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/qmf-ui/css/qmf.css
There's a licence file in the parent directories e.g.
qpid-0.24/tools/src/java/bin/qpid-web/web/itablet/css/LICENCE
That refers to files therein
I wasn't wildly keen to bloat up css/js/html files that get served, though to be
fair some of the JavaScript files are pretty big and have loads of comments so
its
a bit moot for them. Is it good enough just to include a licence reference e.g.
/**
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*/
If it is that would seem a fair middle ground
On 23/08/13 14:51, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
As Rob mentioned in his comment on QPID-4961, I noticed there are a number
of new unlicenced files (various xml, html, css, js, md, java files
primarily) spread across the tree that dont have licences and seem like
they need to:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/0.24/0.24rc3_rat_output.txt
Robbie
On 23 August 2013 12:41, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
I have staged the maven artifacts, they are available at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-110
I gave the release archives for the java broker and clients a quick try
out together using the hello world examples, and also declared dependencies
on the key maven artifacts in a test project to ensure the expected
dependency artifacts got picked up.
Robbie
On 21 August 2013 23:38, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, folks. RC3 is now available.
http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.24-rc3/
This RC is signed and ready for promotion to GA. Supposing we don't
find any new critical issues, I will start the release vote on Friday.
Thanks!
Justin
---
0.24 release page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/0.24+Release
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
