It probably should. I will make that explicit in the document.

--Rafael

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Steve Huston <shus...@riverace.com> wrote:

> Great - thanks - I can see it now.
>
> Question on the goals... does the API stabilization item include
> additional API exposed from Proton to detect frame boundaries needed for
> websockets implementations?
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:23 PM
> > To: users@qpid.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Proton release planning
> >
> > I'm not sure exactly what's going on. The link seems to randomly work
> > sometimes and not work at other times. I did just check it in only a few
> > minutes ago, so (random guess) maybe the svnpubsub process has only
> > partially updated whatever cluster serves those pages. I hope it will
> stabilize
> > soon, but until then you can read the source for the document here if you
> > want:
> >
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/site/input/proton/development.md
> >
> > --Rafael
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Steve Huston <shus...@riverace.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The requested URL /proton/development.html was not found on this
> > server.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:00 PM
> > > > To: pro...@qpid.apache.org; d...@qpid.apache.org;
> > > > users@qpid.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Proton release planning
> > > >
> > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to try to get the proton releases to be a bit more
> > > > frequent,
> > > and I'm
> > > > also trying to get a bit more up front planning into them. To that
> > > > end
> > > I've put
> > > > together a quick description of what I'd propose for timeline and
> > > > scope
> > > of
> > > > the next release here:
> > > >
> > > >   http://qpid.apache.org/proton/development.html
> > > >
> > > > Please have a look and let me know what you think.
> > > >
> > > > --Rafael
> > >
>

Reply via email to