Thanks for your quick reply Steve. We are proceeding with xlc as you suggested. I have a feeling though it being aix and all, I will be posting again shortly...
Regards, -Chris > On Dec 16, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Steve Huston <shus...@riverace.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > I don't have any insight into the gcc error. However, I've spent many years > working on AIX with C++. I've had my share of long and unfruitful nights > dealing with gcc. IBM has people involved with gcc and it still seems to have > never-ending problems for some reason. > > For my 2 cents, I recommend biting the bullet and going with xlC++. > > FWIW, > -Steve Huston > > From: Chris Whelan [mailto:chris.whe...@systemsandsoftware.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:54 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Compiling qpid on aix 6.1 with gcc 4.8.2 (or gcc 4.8.3) > > Hello, > > We have been struggling mightily to get qpid to compile on aix 6.1 with gcc. > We have tried both 4.8.2 and 4.8.3 and the error we have run into is: > > /home/dbapi/enquesta_5_0/qpid-cpp-0.30/src/qpid/sys/posix/PosixPoller.cpp:796:2: > internal compiler error: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:868 > }} > ^ > libbacktrace could not find executable to open > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. > make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. > > This appears to be a problem with gcc itself rather than qpid code, but since > we are utilizing the latest version of the gcc compiler I could find for aix > and it still does not work, any help in providing a workaround would be > greatly appreciated. My coworker was able to identify the problematic lines. > Two of the errors appear to be related to the use of the > PollerHandleDeletionManager (Line 701 and 712) and Event (Line 729) > > PollerHandleDeletionManager.destroyThreadState(); (2 occurrences) > Event event = impl->eventStream.next(timeout); (1 occurrence) > > When he commented out those lines (and additional affected code in the case > of the Event line), the compilation of PosixPoller.cpp succeeded. We > surmised that it has something to do with gcc handling of namespaces, but > could not come up with a way to get around this issue. We are planning on > trying IBM's xlc compiler, but we have invested a lot of time in this already > and would like to avoid xlc licensing costs if possible. > > Thanks in advance, > > Regards, > > Chris Whelan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
