My typical "bootstrap" install on RHEL7: First, add the epel repos. Then,
If I want qpidd, I usually just: $ yum install qpid-cpp-server qpid-tools And for qdrouterd: $ yum install qpid-dispatch-router qpid-dispatch-tools qpid-dispatch-docs qpid-dispatch-router-docs To develop AMQP 1.0 clients using python or C: yum install python-qpid-proton qpid-proton-c-devel python-qpid-proton-doc qpid-proton-c-devel-doc qpid-proton-debuginfo That's usually enough to do some serious damage. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rob Godfrey" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:13:35 AM > Subject: Re: General Question: Is there an implied order of installing QPID > packages? > > On 3 March 2016 at 15:33, Flores, Paul A. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ted, > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > It has been our experience that there are dependencies between packages > > that is not clearly or explicitly described. Which has lead us to the > > belief that order of installation is important. > > > > For instance both the C++ and Java Brokers. Only after they are installed > > does it become clear that the Python tools are necessary for the > > configuration of the broker. > > > > > Just to be clear, the Java broker does not rely on the Python tools in any > way :-) Java Broker configuration is carried out through its own Web > Management Console, or by using the HTTP REST API that underlies it (or, if > you wish, by hand editing configuration files). The Java broker does not > support QMF directly and so the Python tools cannot be used to configure it. > > -- Rob > > > > > It is these subtle dependencies that have us wondering if there is any > > explicit guidance as to the proper order in which to install each of these > > packages. > > > > Again the intent is to provide guidance so that development environments > > are setup in a consistent and "standard" manner. At the very least so we > > can standup a standard VM image for our developer "on boarding" process. > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Ted Ross [[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 7:49 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: General Question: Is there an implied order of installing > > QPID packages? > > > > On 03/02/2016 06:17 PM, Flores, Paul A. wrote: > > > Is there a order in which Qpid packages should be installed in? > > > > > > > > > > > > Proposed development environment to use C++ (Broker & Proton) and Java. > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking for guidance for getting developer RHEL 7 environments setup. > > > > Your best bet for RHEL7 is to enable the EPEL7 (Extra Packages for > > Enterprise Linux) repo and simply "yum install" the desired development > > packages. EPEL7 has the latest upstream qpidd, proton, and dispatch > > packages. > > > > I'm not sure if the Qpid Java components are packaged here. These may > > need to be installed from upstream. > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions/recommendations/insights are welcomed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- -K --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
