Hi Ganesh

here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-734
I will try to do more tests.

Thx.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ganesh Murthy <gmur...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Olivier Mallassi" <olivier.malla...@gmail.com>
> > To: users@qpid.apache.org
> > Cc: "Alan Conway" <acon...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 3:30:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: Configuring addresses starting with '/' on qpid-dispatch
> router 0.7.0
> >
> > To complement and certainly explain the need, We would like urls like
> > amqp://ip:port/domain/subdomain1/queueA or
> > amqp://ip:port/domain/subdomain2/queueB
> >  + use routing capabilities to route queueA, queueB on different brokers
> or
> > even queueA to brokers and queueB to another dispatch-router (e.g. for
> > external integration)
> >
> > I did some really quick and basic tests using the dispatch-router.
> > § qdmanage create --type org.apache.qpid.dispatch.router.config.autoLink
> > addr=/domain/subdomain/queueA dir=in connection=broker3
> > § sending / receiving messaging using the simple_recv/send.py scripts.
> >
> > It appears that the messages are well published / consumed. sounds
> correct
> > to you?
> >
> > yet (and this is not really important), the qdstat displays weird labels
> >
> > mobile      queue.first            0               0      0       0    0
> > 0     0        0
> >
> >   local       temp.2ndwYNc5ZaHaD2O                   1      0       0
> > 0    0     0        0
> >
> >   unknown: s  ubdomain/queueA                        1      0       200
> > 200  0     0        0
> >
> >   unknown: s  ubdomain/queueA                        0      0       0
> > 0    0     0        0
> >
> > version used: dispatch-router 0.7.0
> >
> The above qdstat output does look weird. Can you please enter a JIRA
> detailing the steps we can use to reproduce this this problem?
> Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 29 March 2017 at 11:48, Ted Ross <tr...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 03/08/2017 02:33 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 09:58 +0000, Antoine Chevin wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Do you have an idea on the below behavior?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> This is related to early drafts of the AMQP addressing
> specification,
> > > >> but those are out of date now and the specification is still not
> > > >> released.
> > > >>
> > > >> Given that, I think this behavior is probably not helpful - dispatch
> > > >> should accept address exactly as provided by the user and do no
> > > >> modification. I'm not 100% sure if that would cause any internal
> > > >> problems for the router, if not we should raise an issue.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ted do you have any thoughts?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Dispatch normalizes addresses to make sure that various "equivalent"
> > > forms
> > > > are hashed to the same entry in the address table.
> > > >
> > > > As Alan pointed out, we use a URL-like address format per early
> drafts of
> > > > the addressing specification.  As such, the leading slash is removed
> from
> > > > the normalized address.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > What are the normalization rules, and why is dispatch assuming that
> > > removing a leading slash is correct (since in this case it is not - the
> > > Java Broker does its own normalization - and if you want you can query
> it
> > > and find out what prefixes it considers equivalent)?
> > >
> > > -- Rob
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>> Thank you,
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Antoine
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> From: Antoine Chevin [mailto:antoine.che...@gmail.com]
> > > >>> Sent: jeudi 2 mars 2017 10:43
> > > >>> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> > > >>> Subject: Configuring addresses starting with '/' on qpid-dispatch
> > > >>> router
> > > >>> 0.7.0
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I tried to configure addresses starting with a '/' but using
> qdstat I
> > > >>> see
> > > >>> that this '/' is removed. Is it expected?
> > > >>> I noticed the same behavior with autolinks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you,
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Antoine
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to