Hello Alan,

thank you for your answer. I could install pacemaker using "apt-get install
pacemaker".

If you could give me some hints what to do to get it run it would be
welcome.

Thanks,
Andreas

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote:

> rgmanager has been replaced by pacemaker on RHEL7, I'm not sure what is
> available on Ubuntu. There is no out-of-the-box integration with pacemaker
> or other cluster managers, but all that is needed is some configuration and
> a couple of scripts to enable the cluster manager to start, stop and
> promote Qpid brokers at the appropriate time - the cluster manager already
> knows what the "appropriate time" is based on its liveness and membership
> rules. If you're interested in trying to make it work, I can give you more
> pointers on what is needed.
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Steve Huston <shus...@riverace.com> wrote:
>
> > I have used the qpid C++ broker in clusters. On RHEL 6. Works very well.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: andi welchlin [mailto:andi.welch...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 12:00 PM
> > > To: users@qpid.apache.org
> > > Subject: HA Cluster using Qpid C++ Broker 1.36.0
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to configure a HA cluster using the Qpid C++ message
> broker
> > > 1.36.0. In the handbook I read that rgmanager is neccessary.
> > >
> > > When I try to install it on Ubuntu 16.04 it is not found. On a Fedora
> > installation
> > > it is also not found.
> > >
> > > Is anyone here using the Qpid message broker in a cluster?
> > >
> > > Are you using rgmanager or is there some other cluster manager usable
> on
> > > Linux?
> > >
> > > Any hints are welcome ... even if you say "noone uses the Qpid broker
> in
> > a
> > > cluster".
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Andreas
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to