On 22/03/18 12:32, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 22 March 2018 at 12:27, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote:
On 22/03/18 12:07, Rob Godfrey wrote:
I think logically the transaction should be marked "rollback
only" inside the broker. Any attempt to commit should result in error,
but
an attempt to rollback should succeed.
What if a client tries to rollback a transaction involving the consumption
of from a queue that has since been deleted and publishing of those messages
to another queue (which has not been deleted)?
Then the transaction will be rolled back and the related
consumption+publish will not proceed, which is what the client
apparently desires if trying to roll things back?
(Not sure I understood the question..)
I didn't ask the right question!
One question is whether an explicit rollback would get an error (since
actually the messages will not remain on the original queue as that has
been deleted).
Another question is whether you would permit the client to commit such a
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
