> RHEL is pushing Dispatcher + Broker-J (Artemis based) as the new A-MQ
> solution.
I will say that for my product, we evaluated replacing JMS/ActiveMQ (5.x
vintage) with both Artemis and Qpid Broker-J (we are a Java shop) and Qpid was
the clear choice for us.
We cautiously switched to Broker-J and have not regretted the choice and have
not looked back.
Qpid rocks!
--
Tom Jordahl
On 3/7/20, 5:48 AM, "Rob Godfrey" <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 at 04:16, Virgilio Fornazin <virgilioforna...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> RHEL is pushing Dispatcher + Broker-J (Artemis based) as the new A-MQ
> solution.
>
Just to be clear Artemis is part of the ActiveMQ project and not related to
Qpid Broker-J
-- Rob
> With container and another new things happening, could be the new way.
> But C++ broker still the fastest and best broker around for me
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:33 PM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The C++ broker sees occasional bug fixes (some are probably overdue a
> > release currently, its been a while), but there isnt active feature
> > development around it.
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 15:39, Bruce Parr <bruce.p...@pgs.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Is the C++ broker still under development/maintenance, or should we
> > start thinking about switching to Broker-J?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
